tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Keuntae Park (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (TAJO-448) Timestamp should be based on unixtime
Date Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:52:52 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13855446#comment-13855446
] 

Keuntae Park edited comment on TAJO-448 at 12/23/13 6:52 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

It looks good to me, too.
But, are 32 bits enough to represent unix time?
32 bits unix time only supports up to 2038-01-19 and PostgreSQL looks to support unix time
bigger than 32 bits.


was (Author: sirpkt):
It looks good to me, too.
But, are 32 bits enough to represent unix time?
32 bits unix time only supports up to 2038-01-19 and PostgreSQL looks to support bigger than
32 bits unix time.

> Timestamp should be based on unixtime
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-448
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-448
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: data type
>            Reporter: Hyunsik Choi
>            Assignee: Hyunsik Choi
>             Fix For: 0.8-incubating
>
>         Attachments: TAJO-448.patch
>
>
> The current timestamp type is based on milliseconds. This patch changes timestamp type
to be based on unixtime.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Mime
View raw message