systemml-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mike Dusenberry (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SYSTEMML-1185) SystemML Breast Cancer Project
Date Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:29:00 GMT


Mike Dusenberry commented on SYSTEMML-1185:

Update: I merged a large number of changes that were in the [experimental branch |]
into master in [commit 532da1b |].
  This includes our Keras experiments, updates to the preprocessing, shell script helpers,
file reorganization, and documentation improvements.

> SystemML Breast Cancer Project
> ------------------------------
>                 Key: SYSTEMML-1185
>                 URL:
>             Project: SystemML
>          Issue Type: Epic
>            Reporter: Mike Dusenberry
>            Assignee: Mike Dusenberry
>         Attachments: approach.svg
> h1. Predicting Breast Cancer Proliferation Scores with Apache Spark and Apache SystemML
> h3. Overview
> The [Tumor Proliferation Assessment Challenge 2016 (TUPAC16) |]
is a "Grand Challenge" that was created for the [2016 Medical Image Computing and Computer
Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2016) |] conference.  In this challenge,
the goal is to develop state-of-the-art algorithms for automatic prediction of tumor proliferation
scores from whole-slide histopathology images of breast tumors.
> h3. Background
> Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancerous death in women in less-developed countries,
and is the second leading cause of cancerous deaths in developed countries, accounting for
29% of all cancers in women within the U.S. \[1]. Survival rates increase as early detection
increases, giving incentive for pathologists and the medical world at large to develop improved
methods for even earlier detection \[2].  There are many forms of breast cancer including
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS), Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC), Tubular Carcinoma of the
Breast, Medullary Carcinoma of the Breast, Invasive Lobular Carcinoma, Inflammatory Breast
Cancer and several others \[3]. Within all of these forms of breast cancer, the rate in which
breast cancer cells grow (proliferation), is a strong indicator of a patient’s prognosis.
Although there are many means of determining the presence of breast cancer, tumor proliferation
speed has been proven to help pathologists determine the treatment for the patient. The most
common technique for determining the proliferation speed is through mitotic count (mitotic
index) estimates, in which a pathologist counts the dividing cell nuclei in hematoxylin and
eosin (H&E) stained slide preparations to determine the number of mitotic bodies.  Given
this, the pathologist produces a proliferation score of either 1, 2, or 3, ranging from better
to worse prognosis \[4]. Unfortunately, this approach is known to have reproducibility problems
due to the variability in counting, as well as the difficulty in distinguishing between different
> References:  
> \[1]  
> \[2]  
> \[3]  
> \[4]  
> h3. Goal & Approach
> In an effort to automate the process of classification, this project aims to develop
a large-scale deep learning approach for predicting tumor scores directly from the pixels
of whole-slide histopathology images.  Our proposed approach is based on a recent research
paper from Stanford \[1].  Starting with 500 extremely high-resolution tumor slide images
with accompanying score labels, we aim to make use of Apache Spark in a preprocessing step
to cut and filter the images into smaller square samples, generating 4.7 million samples for
a total of ~7TB of data \[2].  We then utilize Apache SystemML on top of Spark to develop
and train a custom, large-scale, deep convolutional neural network on these samples, making
use of the familiar linear algebra syntax and automatically-distributed execution of SystemML
\[3].  Our model takes as input the pixel values of the individual samples, and is trained
to predict the correct tumor score classification for each one.  In addition to distributed
linear algebra, we aim to exploit task-parallelism via parallel for-loops for hyperparameter
optimization, as well as hardware acceleration for faster training via a GPU-backed runtime.
 Ultimately, we aim to develop a model that is sufficiently stronger than existing approaches
for the task of breast cancer tumor proliferation score classification.
> References:  
> \[1]  
> \[2] See [{{Preprocessing.ipynb}} |].
> \[3] See [{{MachineLearning.ipynb}} |],
[{{softmax_clf.dml}} |],
and [{{convnet.dml}} |].
> !approach.svg!
> ----
> h2. Systems Tasks
> From a systems perspective, we aim to support multi-node, multi-GPU distributed SGD training
to support large-scale experiments for the specific breast cancer use case.
> To achieve this goal, the following steps as necessary:
> # Single-node, CPU mini-batch SGD training (1 mini-batch at a time).
> # Single-node, single-GPU mini-batch SGD training (1 mini-batch at a time).
> # Single-node, multi-GPU data-parallel mini-batch SGD training (`n` parallel mini-batches
for `n` GPUs at a time).
> # Multi-node, CPU data-parallel mini-batch SGD training (`n` parallel mini-batches for
`n` parallel tasks at a time).
> # Multi-node, single-GPU data-parallel mini-batch SGD training (`n` parallel mini-batches
for `n` total GPUs across the cluster at a time).
> # Multi-node, multi-GPU data-parallel mini-batch SGD training (`n` parallel mini-batches
for `n` total GPUs across the cluster at a time).
> ---
> Here is a list of past and present JIRA epics and issues that have blocked, or are currently
blocking progress on the breast cancer project.
> Overall Deep Learning Epic
>   *
>   *This is the overall "Deep Learning" JIRA epic, with all issues either within or related
to the epic.
> Past
> *
> *
>   ** Issue that completely blocked mini-batch training approaches.
> *
>   ** Epic containing issues related to input DataFrame conversions that blocked getting
data into the system entirely.  Most of the issues specifically refer to existing, internal
converters.  993 was a particularly large issue, and triggered a large body of work related
to internal memory estimates that were incorrect.  Also see 919, 946, & 994.
> *
> *
> *
> Present
> *
>   ** Current open blocker to efficiently using a stochastic gradient descent approach.
> *
>   ** Current open blocker to training even an initial deep learning model for the project.
 This is another example of an internal compiler bug.
> *
>   ** We need distributed convolution and max pooling operators.
> *
>   ** This is the main issue that discusses the need for the `parfor` construct to support
efficient, parallel hyperparameter tuning on a cluster with large datasets.  The broken remote
parfor in 1129 blocked this issue, which in turned blocked any meaningful work on training
a deep neural net for the project.
> *
>   ** This was one of the blockers to doing hyperparameter tuning.
> *
>   ** This is an epic for the issue in which the `parfor` construct was broken for remote
Spark cases, and was one of the blockers for doing hyperparameter tuning.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message