systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthias Boehm <mboe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release Planning SystemML 1.2
Date Sun, 12 Aug 2018 05:45:31 GMT
Well, this took a little longer than expected but now we have resolved
all issues and performance regressions. Therefore, I think we should
be ready to cut an RC1 for SystemML 1.2 early next week. So please
hold off any major new features for now to minimize the chances of
regressions during this RC phase.

Regards,
Matthias

On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Janardhan <janardhan@apache.org> wrote:
> Nvidia have official support for prebuilt docker image(CUDA + CuDNN) only
> for Ubuntu. This will be convenient for us.
>
> Nvidia drivers are simply hanging my machine (CentOS 7), but it is easier
> to change this at a later date.
>
> Thank you,
> Janardhan
>
> On Monday, June 25, 2018, Berthold Reinwald <reinwald@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> either one would be great but having the GPU integration is a plus. Why
>> wouldn't that be possible for Centos?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Berthold Reinwald
>> IBM Almaden Research Center
>> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
>> e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
>>
>>
>>
>> From:   Janardhan <janardhan.pulivarthi@gmail.com>
>> To:     "dev@systemml.apache.org" <dev@systemml.apache.org>
>> Date:   06/24/2018 05:56 AM
>> Subject:        Re: Release Planning SystemML 1.2
>>
>>
>>
>> One more thing, I am already building a docker image. But, which image do
>> you prefer
>>
>> 1. CentOS 7 or
>> 2. Ubuntu - Later extensible to GPU very easily.
>>
>> This decreases setup time to six minutes on any platform, even for non
>> devs.
>>
>> Thank you
>> Janardhan
>>
>> On Sunday, June 24, 2018, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > given the current status of open tasks and the delay with regard to
>> > QA, I think we need to push this release out by a couple of weeks.
>> > Does mid to end July sound good to everyone?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Matthias
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:28 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > thanks Berthold - that sounds good. We'll probably start a little
>> > > earlier with the tests to ensure the python test suite gives the same
>> > > results for the set of overlapping algorithms.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Matthias
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Berthold Reinwald
>> <reinwald@us.ibm.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> +1. Happy to kick off the release scripts the week of June 25th. We
>> > should
>> > >> probably kick off the python perf test suite the week before to avoid
>> > >> hiccups.
>> > >>
>> > >> Regards,
>> > >> Berthold Reinwald
>> > >> IBM Almaden Research Center
>> > >> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
>> > >> e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> From:   Krishna Kalyan <krishnakalyan3@gmail.com>
>> > >> To:     dev@systemml.apache.org
>> > >> Date:   06/05/2018 10:09 PM
>> > >> Subject:        Re: Release Planning SystemML 1.2
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> +1
>> > >>
>> > >> I am completely available to help with the QA cycle and help with
>> > >> switching
>> > >> to new perf test suite.
>> > >>
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >> Krishna
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Hi all,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> given our current release cadence of about 3 month, we should start
>> > >>> talking about our SystemML 1.2 release. There have been many new
>> > >>> features, improvements over all backends, and various critical
>> fixes.
>> > >>> I know there are still some tasks that should go into 1.2, and
for
>> > >>> this QA cycle we'd like to switch to the new python perf test suite.
>> > >>> How about we aim for an RC1 by end of June which would give us
more
>> > >>> than 3 weeks from now?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Regards,
>> > >>> Matthias
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message