systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Niketan Pansare" <npan...@us.ibm.com>
Subject Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline
Date Fri, 01 Dec 2017 21:31:27 GMT
+1.

Thanks 

Niketan 

> On Dec 1, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> After multiple runs of our perftest suite over 80MB-800GB with Spark 2.1
> and 2.2, with and without codegen, as well as with and without compression,
> we found and fixed quite a number of issues. However, there are a couple of
> remaining performance issues with sparse maxpooling operations, so I would
> recommend to defer the RC1 for a couple of days until these issues are
> fixed as well.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Krishna Kalyan <krishnakalyan3@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Krishna
>> 
>>> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> just FYI: I've created SYSTEMML-2011 to track all QA-related tasks and
>>> issues. The first run of our (old) perftest suite for 80MB-80GB ran fine
>>> except for a data generation issue on stratstats for the 80GB case. Btw,
>> I
>>> think it would be good to run both the old and new perftest for
>> additional
>>> validation.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Matthias
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Glenn Weidner <gweidner@us.ibm.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Glenn
>>>> 
>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for "Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017
>>> 06:51:44
>>>> AM---+1. Thanks,]"Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017 06:51:44 AM---+1.
>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> From: "Niketan Pansare" <npansar@us.ibm.com>
>>>> To: dev@systemml.apache.org
>>>> Date: 11/08/2017 06:51 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> +1.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Niketan.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 7, 2017, at 10:50 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@googlemail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> we made some good progress regarding deep learning support, code
>>>>> generation, and low-latency scoring - so, I'm looking forward to our
>>>>> upcoming 1.0 release. Since it's our first stable release, I think it
>>>> would
>>>>> be a good idea to allocate some extra time for QA. How about we shoot
>>> for
>>>> a
>>>>> release candidate Dec 1?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Matthias
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message