systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthias Boehm <mboe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline
Date Fri, 01 Dec 2017 20:45:34 GMT
After multiple runs of our perftest suite over 80MB-800GB with Spark 2.1
and 2.2, with and without codegen, as well as with and without compression,
we found and fixed quite a number of issues. However, there are a couple of
remaining performance issues with sparse maxpooling operations, so I would
recommend to defer the RC1 for a couple of days until these issues are
fixed as well.

Regards,
Matthias

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Krishna Kalyan <krishnakalyan3@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Regards,
> Krishna
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > just FYI: I've created SYSTEMML-2011 to track all QA-related tasks and
> > issues. The first run of our (old) perftest suite for 80MB-80GB ran fine
> > except for a data generation issue on stratstats for the 80GB case. Btw,
> I
> > think it would be good to run both the old and new perftest for
> additional
> > validation.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Glenn Weidner <gweidner@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Glenn
> > >
> > > [image: Inactive hide details for "Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017
> > 06:51:44
> > > AM---+1. Thanks,]"Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017 06:51:44 AM---+1.
> > Thanks,
> > >
> > > From: "Niketan Pansare" <npansar@us.ibm.com>
> > > To: dev@systemml.apache.org
> > > Date: 11/08/2017 06:51 AM
> > > Subject: Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Niketan.
> > >
> > > > On Nov 7, 2017, at 10:50 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > we made some good progress regarding deep learning support, code
> > > > generation, and low-latency scoring - so, I'm looking forward to our
> > > > upcoming 1.0 release. Since it's our first stable release, I think it
> > > would
> > > > be a good idea to allocate some extra time for QA. How about we shoot
> > for
> > > a
> > > > release candidate Dec 1?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message