systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthias Boehm <mboe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline
Date Sat, 02 Dec 2017 23:09:37 GMT
Meanwhile, the remaining correctness and performance issues of sparse
maxpooling backward operations have been fixed (SYSTEMML-2034, 2035). So I
think we're in good shape to cut an RC1 now.

Regards,
Matthias

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@gmail.com> wrote:

> After multiple runs of our perftest suite over 80MB-800GB with Spark 2.1
> and 2.2, with and without codegen, as well as with and without compression,
> we found and fixed quite a number of issues. However, there are a couple of
> remaining performance issues with sparse maxpooling operations, so I would
> recommend to defer the RC1 for a couple of days until these issues are
> fixed as well.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Krishna Kalyan <krishnakalyan3@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Regards,
>> Krishna
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > just FYI: I've created SYSTEMML-2011 to track all QA-related tasks and
>> > issues. The first run of our (old) perftest suite for 80MB-80GB ran fine
>> > except for a data generation issue on stratstats for the 80GB case.
>> Btw, I
>> > think it would be good to run both the old and new perftest for
>> additional
>> > validation.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Matthias
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Glenn Weidner <gweidner@us.ibm.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Glenn
>> > >
>> > > [image: Inactive hide details for "Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017
>> > 06:51:44
>> > > AM---+1. Thanks,]"Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017 06:51:44 AM---+1.
>> > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > From: "Niketan Pansare" <npansar@us.ibm.com>
>> > > To: dev@systemml.apache.org
>> > > Date: 11/08/2017 06:51 AM
>> > > Subject: Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline
>> > > ------------------------------
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > +1.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > Niketan.
>> > >
>> > > > On Nov 7, 2017, at 10:50 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@googlemail.com
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi all,
>> > > >
>> > > > we made some good progress regarding deep learning support, code
>> > > > generation, and low-latency scoring - so, I'm looking forward to our
>> > > > upcoming 1.0 release. Since it's our first stable release, I think
>> it
>> > > would
>> > > > be a good idea to allocate some extra time for QA. How about we
>> shoot
>> > for
>> > > a
>> > > > release candidate Dec 1?
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > Matthias
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message