systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Krishna Kalyan <krishnakaly...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline
Date Tue, 14 Nov 2017 21:31:38 GMT
+1

Regards,
Krishna

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@gmail.com> wrote:

> just FYI: I've created SYSTEMML-2011 to track all QA-related tasks and
> issues. The first run of our (old) perftest suite for 80MB-80GB ran fine
> except for a data generation issue on stratstats for the 80GB case. Btw, I
> think it would be good to run both the old and new perftest for additional
> validation.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Glenn Weidner <gweidner@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Regards,
> > Glenn
> >
> > [image: Inactive hide details for "Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017
> 06:51:44
> > AM---+1. Thanks,]"Niketan Pansare" ---11/08/2017 06:51:44 AM---+1.
> Thanks,
> >
> > From: "Niketan Pansare" <npansar@us.ibm.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.apache.org
> > Date: 11/08/2017 06:51 AM
> > Subject: Re: SystemML 1.0 release timeline
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > +1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Niketan.
> >
> > > On Nov 7, 2017, at 10:50 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > we made some good progress regarding deep learning support, code
> > > generation, and low-latency scoring - so, I'm looking forward to our
> > > upcoming 1.0 release. Since it's our first stable release, I think it
> > would
> > > be a good idea to allocate some extra time for QA. How about we shoot
> for
> > a
> > > release candidate Dec 1?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message