systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Niketan Pansare" <npan...@us.ibm.com>
Subject Re: Consistency SystemML configuration properties
Date Sun, 17 Sep 2017 00:08:08 GMT
+1 for consistency especially before 1.0 release.

Thanks 

Niketan 

> On Sep 16, 2017, at 4:50 PM, Glenn Weidner <gweidner@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 for 'sysml'.
> 
> Thanks,
> Glenn
> 
> Matthias Boehm ---09/16/2017 04:34:46 PM---Currently, our SystemML configuration properties
use an inconsistent prefix scheme. For example, som
> 
> From: Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.apache.org
> Date: 09/16/2017 04:34 PM
> Subject: Consistency SystemML configuration properties
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Currently, our SystemML configuration properties use an inconsistent prefix
> scheme. For example, some properties use the prefix 'dml' (e.g.,
> dml.yarn.appmaster), others 'systemml' (e.g., systemml.stats.finegrained),
> and yet others no prefix at all (e.g., localtmpdir).
> 
> We discussed this before but we never actually made the change. I would
> prefer the prefix 'sysml' for consistency with our package names. Are there
> any other preferences? If not, I'll make this change end of next week.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
> 
> 


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message