systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nakul Jindal <naku...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Consistency SystemML configuration properties
Date Sun, 17 Sep 2017 00:59:19 GMT
+1


On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:47 PM <dusenberrymw@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Sep 16, 2017, at 5:08 PM, Niketan Pansare <npansar@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for consistency especially before 1.0 release.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Niketan
> >
> >> On Sep 16, 2017, at 4:50 PM, Glenn Weidner <gweidner@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 for 'sysml'.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Glenn
> >>
> >> Matthias Boehm ---09/16/2017 04:34:46 PM---Currently, our SystemML
> configuration properties use an inconsistent prefix scheme. For example, som
> >>
> >> From: Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> >> To: dev@systemml.apache.org
> >> Date: 09/16/2017 04:34 PM
> >> Subject: Consistency SystemML configuration properties
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Currently, our SystemML configuration properties use an inconsistent
> prefix
> >> scheme. For example, some properties use the prefix 'dml' (e.g.,
> >> dml.yarn.appmaster), others 'systemml' (e.g.,
> systemml.stats.finegrained),
> >> and yet others no prefix at all (e.g., localtmpdir).
> >>
> >> We discussed this before but we never actually made the change. I would
> >> prefer the prefix 'sysml' for consistency with our package names. Are
> there
> >> any other preferences? If not, I'll make this change end of next week.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message