systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From dusenberr...@gmail.com
Subject Re: Consistency SystemML configuration properties
Date Sun, 17 Sep 2017 00:47:25 GMT
+1

--

Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry

Sent from my iPhone.


> On Sep 16, 2017, at 5:08 PM, Niketan Pansare <npansar@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 for consistency especially before 1.0 release.
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> Niketan 
> 
>> On Sep 16, 2017, at 4:50 PM, Glenn Weidner <gweidner@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> 
>> +1 for 'sysml'.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Glenn
>> 
>> Matthias Boehm ---09/16/2017 04:34:46 PM---Currently, our SystemML configuration
properties use an inconsistent prefix scheme. For example, som
>> 
>> From: Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@googlemail.com>
>> To: dev@systemml.apache.org
>> Date: 09/16/2017 04:34 PM
>> Subject: Consistency SystemML configuration properties
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Currently, our SystemML configuration properties use an inconsistent prefix
>> scheme. For example, some properties use the prefix 'dml' (e.g.,
>> dml.yarn.appmaster), others 'systemml' (e.g., systemml.stats.finegrained),
>> and yet others no prefix at all (e.g., localtmpdir).
>> 
>> We discussed this before but we never actually made the change. I would
>> prefer the prefix 'sysml' for consistency with our package names. Are there
>> any other preferences? If not, I'll make this change end of next week.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, 7-Bit, 0 bytes)
View raw message