Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7E7200C64 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 19:42:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CBFAC160BA3; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E383160B95 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 19:42:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 34501 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2017 17:42:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@systemml.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 34489 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2017 17:42:39 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:42:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A0F98C04EF for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:42:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.379 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nm0fxT0ohJb5 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com (mail-it0-f41.google.com [209.85.214.41]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 383855FBB9 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f41.google.com with SMTP id g66so47598660ite.1 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:42:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gwaOCHQK5yPy+VC1uLe35wZTJbZIei38b/5QrUYUNJw=; b=bIIcj7avrHoSX0O7rygwLrL1VpbqZczBvcnqiZZfruokyrT7l4K87UUlJu+u1nzVun Sfgtz2Uhc4NSrzeAPINKHlI8Vwq/wrCjFJfmpqDiATjumY5DOcWcqgZKQwWGkTpNk7FC gDwKaEvADKi71SEPagfq2oPrBlIVEUIQwmfvNSRvglqTJgKQG2cotClplo4vbulvKZUS r6ugderpE9779C5qvwf6dJaYuG8MSJoSkkPfoLbvar6KYH7GW0qjZKA9JUcPfg5umxD+ pGHR052hQtkfubw6nZAbz98J0+YuqBXwtHzBxs915hCqqdFkXT5nkkXhcChQktFctDup 38zA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gwaOCHQK5yPy+VC1uLe35wZTJbZIei38b/5QrUYUNJw=; b=Y8VzstAOfNtf3hpC8jyBBuTtXVKhqgvu/FYg70a3zg9CK9fUtwlAJ17X+1+KbL/Eel CtDnNxKo7XyVqaThPQa7HsIvjtAH1xUizZhANIpvAj+SwHuA9IbHNBIspgXMCYBXQgJs 4WSabPZP2NX3gJVLSXNj20qSXGcCLOOSXBNIOYmACnLHjgmrQbFXrfsdXUr1rD/Gipy8 /wi8QLAJ6Y5RpEWlTiaAcLHNm8vJIHQEMnrH9lxut4v3BYX/yfS6IBpZZ9wigftDnGjk s93V21V30IwsSde624Zb3vblmFv9NZxgGKsARB81K/eoPyrlEt0QMg6RdrHscPPNCgl9 WM3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5yzRMLzy022Eu9xOsWKBjttkZruR6xIU/zpgqY76C4d/21Nzm1 7HZKKw4qQpbgYKZJJspgtR7exZ6931Wh X-Received: by 10.157.35.136 with SMTP id t8mr5122655otb.59.1493401356545; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:42:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.231.72 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:42:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Deron Eriksson Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:42:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Build passed/failed messages for pull requests To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11490a1a5d3599054e3d9982 archived-at: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:42:41 -0000 --001a11490a1a5d3599054e3d9982 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, When a pull request is created or another commit is pushed to that pull request, a build including running our test suite is performed (Jenkins at https://sparktc.ibmcloud.com/jenkins/job/SystemML-PullRequestBuilder/). This is the same model that other projects such as Apache Spark use (Jenkins at https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/). A few days ago, automated build passed/failed pull request messages were introduced to our pull requests, following the same type of Spark model. A) SystemML example: https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/pull/442 B) Spark example: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17765 Personally I like these messages because for contributors that do pull requests, it automatically tells them the status of the build for their pull requests and gives them a direct link to the build/test results. An opposing viewpoint would be that these messages are somewhat like spam. So we should make a public decision on the mailing list what to do about these automated build status messages. Some options: (1) keep the automated messages exactly as they are (2) keep the automated messages, but consolidate the two messages into one (such as "Build successful" and "Refer to this link..."). (3) get rid of the automated messages I like (2). Any other opinions or options? Thoughts? Deron -- Deron Eriksson Spark Technology Center http://www.spark.tc/ --001a11490a1a5d3599054e3d9982--