Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E054200BA7 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 01:58:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 0CA10160ADB; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 23:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FBB2160AE0 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 01:58:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 31841 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2016 23:58:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@systemml.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31820 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2016 23:58:13 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 23:58:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E96B9C0C0A for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 23:58:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.299 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_LIVE=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_MID=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7_asDAzfBs_u for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 23:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1B8995FAEF for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 23:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id u96Nrre8063263 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 19:58:06 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.152]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 25wu5c6csu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 19:58:06 -0400 Received: from localhost by e34.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 17:58:05 -0600 Received: from d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.202.179) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 17:58:03 -0600 X-IBM-Helo: d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: mboehm@us.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Received: from b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.20]) by d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CC019D801C for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 17:57:30 -0600 (MDT) Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.233]) by b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u96Nw32W13566256 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 16:58:03 -0700 Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AA913603A for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 17:58:03 -0600 (MDT) Received: from d50lp01.ny.us.ibm.com (unknown [146.89.104.207]) by b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5F65136046 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 17:58:02 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost by d50lp01.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 19:58:02 -0400 Received: from smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (192.155.248.91) by d50lp01.ny.us.ibm.com (158.87.18.20) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128) Thu, 6 Oct 2016 19:57:59 -0400 Received: from localhost by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP for from ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 23:57:58 -0000 Received: from us1a3-smtp03.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com (10.106.154.98) by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (10.106.227.143) with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 23:57:56 -0000 Received: from us1a3-mail149.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com ([10.146.38.84]) by us1a3-smtp03.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com with ESMTP id 2016100623575639-499034 ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 23:57:56 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org From: "Matthias Boehm" Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 16:57:49 -0700 References: <755056C2-FCCE-4B1D-9C5D-C387F8AD2F3B@gmail.com> <2047554905.3110157.1475195452280@mail.yahoo.com> <883475367.5502592.1475627374412@mail.yahoo.com> <1191970628.6023709.1475694775558@mail.yahoo.com> X-KeepSent: 2540C9CB:513B4AF3-00258044:00834CA6; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0.1FP2 SHF37 August 25, 2014 X-LLNOutbound: False X-Disclaimed: 9283 X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 Content-type: multipart/related; Boundary="0__=8FBB0AD7DF10CA368f9e8a93df938690918c8FBB0AD7DF10CA36" x-cbid: 16100623-0016-0000-0000-000004DCCE3C X-IBM-ISS-SpamDetectors: Score=0.387138; BY=0.293979; FL=0; FP=0; FZ=0; HX=0; KW=0; PH=0; SC=0.387138; ST=0; TS=0; UL=0; ISC= X-IBM-ISS-DetailInfo: BY=3.00005864; HX=3.00000240; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000186; SDB=6.00765236; UDB=6.00365626; UTC=2016-10-06 23:57:57 x-cbparentid: 16100623-9952-0000-0000-0000018391E2 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00005864; HX=3.00000240; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000186; SDB=6.00765236; UDB=6.00365626; IPR=6.00541090; BA=6.00004791; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00012898; XFM=3.00000011; UTC=2016-10-06 23:58:04 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-10-06_10:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609300000 definitions=main-1610060419 archived-at: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 23:58:16 -0000 --0__=8FBB0AD7DF10CA368f9e8a93df938690918c8FBB0AD7DF10CA36 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="1__=8FBB0AD7DF10CA368f9e8a93df938690918c8FBB0AD7DF10CA36" --1__=8FBB0AD7DF10CA368f9e8a93df938690918c8FBB0AD7DF10CA36 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII unfortunately, there is one more blocking issue: SYSTEMML-1014 (one of our algorithms crashing for a particular configuration, which I missed in previous runs of our perf testsuite). Regards, Matthias From: Luciano Resende To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org, Acs S Date: 10/06/2016 04:47 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) Looks like we are about ready for the next RC. Please let me know if not, otherwise I will try to create a new RC later tonight. On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Acs S wrote: > +1 > -Arvind > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 6:59 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > +1 for SYSTEMML-951 > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On Oct 5, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Matthias Boehm wrote: > > > > as the Python DSL is still in experimental status, I don't think that > SYSTEMML-1013 is blocking the release. However, there is one more > nice-to-have performance feature I'd like to include: SYSTEMML-951 (right > indexing via lookup). If nobody objects, we could cut tomorrow once 951 is > in; if somebody get's a chance to look into 1013 then we could include this > too. > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > Acs S ---10/05/2016 12:19:57 PM---Imran has opened Jira 1013. -Arvind > > > > From: Acs S > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" apache.org> > > Date: 10/05/2016 12:19 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > > > > Imran has opened Jira 1013. > > -Arvind > > > > From: Matthias Boehm > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:43 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been resolved too. > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > Acs S ---10/04/2016 05:30:52 PM---There is one more issue I am aware > of: Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure > > > > From: Acs S > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" apache.org> > > Date: 10/04/2016 05:30 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > > There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion issue > in toNumPyArray().Not sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need > resolution for it. > > -Arvind > > From: Luciano Resende > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:03 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009. > > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, wrote: > > > > > The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From > my > > > end, we are ready to go. > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Mike Dusenberry > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm > wrote: > > > > > > > > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008, > there > > > is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python > > > failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am > waiting > > > for > > > > > > > > From: Luciano Resende > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please > let > > > me > > > > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, > which is > > > > > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn > tests > > > > > today that I want to look into before we cut. > > > > > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Mike Dusenberry > > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, > but > > > we > > > > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to > go. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the > following > > > > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open: > > > https://issues.apache.or > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Luciano Resende > > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this > thread, > > > > > open: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993 > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994 > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995 > > > > > > > > > > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that > still > > > need > > > > > > to be handled here ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm < > mboehm@us.ibm.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been > > > resolved - > > > > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016 > > > 10:44:51 > > > > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. > > > > > Th]Matthias > > > > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: > SYSTEMML-969 > > > has > > > > > been > > > > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS > > > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The > open > > > > > issues > > > > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We > > > should be > > > > > able > > > > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of > testing a > > > > > new RC > > > > > > > over the weekend. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed > (I > > > added > > > > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Acs S > > > > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" > > > > > apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF > support > > > > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Arvind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" > > > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance > for > > > > > vector > > > > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on > > > SystemML > > > > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike Dusenberry > > > > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > > > > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende < > > > luckbr1975@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm < > > > mboehm@us.ibm.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting > for > > > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have > feature > > > we > > > > > want > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame > converter). > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > > > >> Matthias > > > > > > > > Great progress !!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved > and I > > > > > will > > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > on RC2. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* > > lresende1975> > > > > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* < > http://lresende.blogspot.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --1__=8FBB0AD7DF10CA368f9e8a93df938690918c8FBB0AD7DF10CA36 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline

unfortunately, there is one more blocking issue: SYSTEMML-10= 14 (one of our algorithms crashing for a particular configuration, which I = missed in previous runs of our perf testsuite).

Regards,
Matthias=

3D"InactiveLuciano Resende ---10/06= /2016 04:47:44 PM---Looks like we are about ready for the next RC. Please l= et me know if not, otherwise I will try to cr

From: Luciano Resende &l= t;luckbr1975@gmail.com>
To:= dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org, Acs S &l= t;acs=5Fs@yahoo.com>
Date: = 10/06/2016 04:47 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apa= che SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)




Looks li= ke we are about ready for the next RC. Please let me know if not,
otherw= ise I will try to create a new RC later tonight.

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016= at 9:04 PM, Acs S <acs=5Fs@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

> +1<= br>> -Arvind
>
>       From: "dusenberry= mw@gmail.com" <dusenberrymw@gmail.com>
>  To: dev@sys= temml.incubator.apache.org
>  Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 6= :59 PM
>  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating = (RC1)
>
> +1 for SYSTEMML-951
>
> --
>
>= ; Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn:= linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>= ;
>
> > On Oct 5, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboeh= m@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > as the Python DSL is stil= l in experimental status, I don't think that
> SYSTEMML-1013 is block= ing the release. However, there is one more
> nice-to-have performanc= e feature I'd like to include: SYSTEMML-951 (right
> indexing via loo= kup). If nobody objects, we could cut tomorrow once 951 is
> in; if s= omebody get's a chance to look into 1013 then we could include this
>= too.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >=
> > Acs S ---10/05/2016 12:19:57 PM---Imran has opened Jira 1013.=  -Arvind
> >
> > From: Acs S <acs=5Fs@yahoo.com.= INVALID>
> > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" = <dev@systemml.incubator.
> apache.org>
> > Date: 10/05= /2016 12:19 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incu= bating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> &g= t; Imran has opened Jira 1013.
> > -Arvind
> >
> &g= t;      From: Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com>
&g= t; > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, O= ctober 4, 2016 5:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.1= 1.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> > ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been r= esolved too.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
&g= t; >
> > Acs S ---10/04/2016 05:30:52 PM---There is one more is= sue I am aware
> of:  Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumP= yArray().Not sure
> >
> > From: Acs S <acs=5Fs@yahoo.c= om.INVALID>
> > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org&quo= t; <dev@systemml.incubator.
> apache.org>
> > Date: 10= /04/2016 05:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-i= ncubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> > There i= s one more issue I am aware of:  Imran facing max recursion issue
&= gt; in toNumPyArray().Not sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need=
> resolution for it.
> > -Arvind
> >    =  From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > To: = dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 20= 16 5:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubati= ng (RC1)
> >
> > Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting= on SYSTEMML-1009.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM= , <dusenberrymw@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The = Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From
> = my
> > > end, we are ready to go.
> > >
> >= ; > -Mike
> > >
> > > --
> > >
&g= t; > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberr= ymw
> > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >= >
> > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >
> >= >
> > > > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <= ;mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > &= gt; > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008,<= br>> there
> > > is one more performance fix I'd like to get= in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,<= br>> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > &g= t; Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
&g= t; > > failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I= am
> waiting
> > > for
> > > >
> &g= t; > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> >= ; > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Da= te: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache S= ystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > >
> > > &g= t;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mik= e, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please
> le= t
> > > me
> > > > know, as I am waiting for the= green light to cut the RC2.
> > > >
> > > > = On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <dusenberrymw@gmail.com> wrote:
&g= t; > > >
> > > > > Yeah I can confirm that all o= f those issues are now resolved,
> which is
> > > > &g= t; great!  However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn> tests
> > > > > today that I want to look into befo= re we cut.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Mike> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > = > >
> > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > >= ; > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > LinkedIn= : linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > >
> > &= gt; > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > >
> >= > > >
> > > > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM= , Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
>= > > > > >
> > > > > > yes, I just clos= ed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm,
> but
> > &g= t; we
> > > > > resolved all known issues yesterday toget= her. We should be good to
> go.
> > > > > >
&= gt; > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Matt= hias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Luci= ano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the
> following> > > > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open= :
> > > https://i= ssues.apache.or
> > > > > >
> > = > > > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
&= gt; > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> = > > > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > > &= gt; > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>= ; > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > &g= t; > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > &= gt; > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this
&= gt; thread,
> > > > > open:
> > > > > &= gt;
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYS= TEMML-993
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.= org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > > > > = htt= ps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > &= gt; > > >
> > > > > > Did folks forgot to clo= de the jiras ? Or are there things that
> still
> > > nee= d
> > > > > > to be handled here ?
> > > &= gt; > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > = > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> mboehm@us.= ibm.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > = >
> > > > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-= 993, 994, and 995 have been
> > > resolved -
> > > = > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
>= ; > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regar= ds,
> > > > > > > Matthias
> > > > &= gt; > >
> > > > > > > [image: Inactive hide d= etails for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
> > > 10:44:51
> &= gt; > > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has bee= n resolved too.
> > > > > Th]Matthias
> > > &= gt; > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update:> SYSTEMML-969
> > > has
> > > > > been> > > > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYST= EMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > > > > >
> > >= > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > &g= t; > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > &= gt; > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > &g= t; > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> = > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
>= > > > > > >
> > > > > > > just a= quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The
> open
>= > > > > issues
> > > > > > > are SYSTE= MML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We
> > > shoul= d be
> > > > > able
> > > > > > >= to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of
> testing = a
> > > > > new RC
> > > > > > > = over the weekend.
> > > > > > >
> > > &= gt; > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Matthias<= br>> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >= Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed
> (I<= br>> > > added
> > > > > > > changes and w= ith UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> > > > &g= t; > >
> > > > > > > From: Acs S <acs=5Fs@= yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > > > To: "dev@s= ystemml.incubator.apache.org"
> <dev@systemml.incubator.
&= gt; > > > > apache.org
> > > > > > > &g= t;
> > > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> = > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-in= cubating (RC1)
> > > > > > > ----------------------= --------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > = > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >= > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF
&g= t; support
> > > > > > > Matthias added he reverted= changes)
> > > > > > >
> > > > >= > > -Arvind
> > > > > > >
> > > = > > > >    From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" &= lt;dusenberrymw@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > To: dev= @systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > Sent: = Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > > > > = Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > &g= t; > > > >
> > > > > > > I've also open= ed SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance
> for
> > &= gt; > > vector
> > > > > > > DataFrame conver= sions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on
> > > SystemML
= > > > > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would b= oth be good to work on.
> > > > > > >
> > = > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> &= gt; > > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > &g= t; > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > > &g= t; LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > > >= ; >
> > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> &= gt; > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> = > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Re= sende <
> > > luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > >= ; > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> = > > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Ma= tthias Boehm <
> > > mboehm@us.ibm.com
> > > >= ; > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > = > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>= SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting
> for
= > > > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, ther= e is also a nice-to-have
> feature
> > > we
> > = > > > want
> > > > > > > to
> > &= gt; > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended datafram= e - frame
> converter).
> > > > > > > >>= ;
> > > > > > > >> Regards,
> > >= > > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > > >= ; > Great progress !!!
> > > > > > > >
>= ; > > > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when thes= e issues get resolved
> and I
> > > > > will
>= ; > > > > > > work
> > > > > > > = > on RC2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > &= gt; > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Lucia= no Resende
> > > > > > > > *http://twitter.com/l= resende1975* <http://twitter.co= m/
> > > lresende1975>
> > > > &= gt; > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > &g= t; > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > &= gt; > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > = > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >= --
> > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > >= > > http://twit= ter.com/lresende1975
> > > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >= ;
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >=
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Lu= ciano Resende
> > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > &g= t; > http://lresende.= blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > >> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
&= gt; > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > <= /tt>http://lresende.blogspot.= com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
&g= t; >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
<= br>

--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/


--1__=8FBB0AD7DF10CA368f9e8a93df938690918c8FBB0AD7DF10CA36-- --0__=8FBB0AD7DF10CA368f9e8a93df938690918c8FBB0AD7DF10CA36--