systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Felix Schüler <fschue...@posteo.de>
Subject Re: Couple of questions on website contents
Date Wed, 26 Oct 2016 06:51:57 GMT
I love the new look & feel of the website and tutorials! (even though there is no Scala
in the animation anymore :( )

I explored the website a little bit further and noticed that the docs haven't benefittet from
the awesome redesign (yet). Is this planned to change?

Also, I want to bring up versioning of the docs again. When hovering over the docs button,
a submenu with release versions for the docs could be available. This would also avoid having
to annotate our MLContext API with 'NEW API' and 'OLD API'.
The version of the docs that is packaged in our release could just be used for the respective
version of the docs on the website and updated from master if corrections happen between releases.

And finally, think it would be good to have a way of getting back to the main website from
the docs with a home button or something.

Besides that, thanks for the great work!
Felix


On 25.10.2016 21:53, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
>
> Since the current website updates are major improvements, I have gone ahead
> and published the new updates. I think we can now start publishing more
> frequently since important parts of the codebase have stabilized.
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Luciano,
> >
> > Several updates to the website were merged today. I think we're at the
> > point where we can publish the new website updates. Do you agree?
> >
> > Deron
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Jason Azares <jason.azares@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Luciano,
> >>
> >> Initial page:
> >>>  - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I
> >>> noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
> >> but it
> >>> looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
> >> and I
> >>> have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies
> >> the
> >>> mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the banner
> >> on
> >>> the initial page.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for bringing this point to our attention. The content on the
> >> initial
> >> page is different from the community page. We wanted to have a call to
> >> action to get users to subscribe to the mailing list. We are currently
> >> designing this section and will send a pull request once completed.
> >>
> >> Navigation Menu:
> >>> - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
> >> duplications.
> >>> We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also
> >> have
> >>> the community get involved link that includes a list of committers using
> >>> the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers
> >> that
> >>> include the old page listing all committers.
> >>
> >>
> >> Dexter is currently working to resolve this issue. He will send his
> >> updates
> >> once they are finished.
> >>
> >> Hope this clears things up!
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have a few questions on the contents of the website in the master
> >> branch
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>> Initial page:
> >>>
> >>>  - What's the intention of the section just above the social banner ? I
> >>> noticed it was actually a copy of a section from the community page,
> >> but it
> >>> looks like the content was duplicated and not extracted to a banner,
> >> and I
> >>> have changed the one in community to what I think it better clarifies
> >> the
> >>> mailing list, but I am not sure if that's the same intent of the banner
> >> on
> >>> the initial page.
> >>>
> >>> Navigation Menu:
> >>> - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
> >> duplications.
> >>> We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We also
> >> have
> >>> the community get involved link that includes a list of committers using
> >>> the new design format, but there is also a link to project committers
> >> that
> >>> include the old page listing all committers.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Once we resolve the items above (which are more like cleanups), I think
> >> we
> >>> might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to the
> >> live
> >>> website.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts ?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Luciano Resende
> >>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>


Mime
View raw message