systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From fschue...@posteo.de
Subject Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Date Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:43:33 GMT
> Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the
> robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain 
> concepts.

Sounds great!

Am 25.10.2016 19:36 schrieb Jason Azares:
> Hey guys,
> 
> Branding wise, we also feel that #1 and #4 are the best choices. It's 
> great
> that we're all on the same page. To answer the question of pros and 
> cons of
> each logo, here is a quick list:
> 
> Logo 1:
> 
> 
>    - More versatile because of its scalability; We think logo 4 will be
>       hard to discern once sized down; Logo 1 looks cleaner in website 
> headers
>       with text
>       - Relevant because it has a matrix bracket
>       - It's a simplified version of the robot. Think of it as the 
> batman
>       signal and the robot is batman.
> 
> Logo 4:
> 
> 
>    - More original because it has a personality
>       - Diverse in the actions it can perform because it can move, 
> animate,
>       and be customized based on intent and use
>       - The robot is kind of cute and approachable
> 
> Our suggestion is to use both. Logo 1 is the simplified version of the
> robot. Logo 4 is the personification of the logo used to explain 
> concepts.
> 
> We'd love to hear your thoughts!
> 
> Regards,
> Jason and the design team
> 
> P.S. In general, here are our guidelines for creating a great logo:
> 
>    - *original* - something that stands out from competitors
>    - *relevant* - reflects the brand's mission and values
>    - *versatile* - look good in black and white, in different colors 
> and
>    sizes depending on context (e.g. billboards, websites, t-shirts, 
> toys,
>    business cards, etc)
>    - *memorable* - easily recognizable everywhere (e.g. mickey mouse, 
> nike)
>    - *timeless* - not just based on what's currently popular
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, <dusenberrymw@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Looks like there is a large amount of support for both #1 and #4. 
>> Design
>> team, could you provide some more thoughts on the pros and cons for 
>> each,
>> and perhaps any thoughts on ways the icons could be used in various 
>> project
>> materials?
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Mike Dusenberry
>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone.
>> 
>> 
>> > On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Acs S <acs_s@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
>> >
>> > I like #4 as well.
>> > +1 on #4.
>> >
>> > -Arvind
>> >
>> >      From: Berthold Reinwald <reinwald@us.ibm.com>
>> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>> > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>> >
>> > +1 on #4.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Berthold Reinwald
>> > IBM Almaden Research Center
>> > office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
>> > e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From:  Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
>> > To:    dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>> > Date:  10/21/2016 04:37 PM
>> > Subject:        Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <frreiss@us.ibm.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>> >>
>> >>
>> > I like option $4 myself as well.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Luciano Resende
>> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> 

Mime
View raw message