systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Niketan Pansare" <npan...@us.ibm.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Date Fri, 21 Oct 2016 20:01:39 GMT

All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !!

I vote for #4.

Thanks,

Niketan Pansare
IBM Almaden Research Center
E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar



From:	Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com>
To:	dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date:	10/21/2016 12:57 PM
Subject:	Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas



Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.

Deron


On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <jason.azares@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I vote for #1
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't
expecting
> > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> >
> > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> >
> >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features
of
> 3
> >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since I
> have
> >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved
such
> as
> >> scalability.
> >>
> >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the ASF (
> >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics), although I
> >> don't know how strict this is.
> >>
> >> Deron
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to remove
> the
> >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no
> intentions
> >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too but
it's
> >>> probably a different context, especially since there are discussions
to
> >>> add
> >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Matthias
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1 for 1
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
> >>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with name
> and
> >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the
other
> 3,
> >>>>> at
> >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric
> >>>>> versions.
> >>>>> They make a great family.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ...........................
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jeremy Anderson
> >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fred
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016
> >>>>>> 11:19:01
> >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee
> >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you
so
> >>>>>> much!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <renee.uxdesign@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> >>>>>> ------------------------------
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng
<rosypenguin@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> google drive:
> >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
> >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Rose
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <
> fschueler@posteo.de>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Rose,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because
of size
> >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and
share the
> link?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Felix
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts,
and we would
> love
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo
that
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> conveys
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is
inspired
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> by a
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> SystemML.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo
> explorations.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> One
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show
how they
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable
parts to
> >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that
SystemML
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> provides,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> so
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> variations.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look,
but we'd
> love
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> suggestions
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>



Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/related (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message