systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nakul Jindal <naku...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Date Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:12:32 GMT
+1 for #1 - more professional and minimalist

Second favorite is 3 or 4 - is more "fun" and conveys the idea of SystemML
being a "black box" and works well with the animation that Rose Peng worked
on.

-Nakul


On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers <madisonjmyers@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 for SystemML action figures as well :D
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers <madisonjmyers@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for what Mike said! I'd say 1 is my favorite and 4 is my second
> > favorite. Would love to incorporate them all as suggested by Mike and
> > Jeremy.
> >
> > These are really great, btw. Awesome work!
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeremy Anderson <
> > jeremy@objectadjective.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 Mike.
> >>
> >> We're working on t-shirt designs, sticker designs, maybe buttons. Action
> >> figures would be really cool!
> >>
> >> ...........................
> >>
> >> Jeremy Anderson
> >> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> >>
> >> On 21 October 2016 at 14:27, <dusenberrymw@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I like all of these options!  I'll give a +1 for #1 as the main logo,
> >> and
> >> > I also think it would be great to make use of the rest of the designs
> >> > throughout the website and other project materials.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!!
> >> >
> >> > -Mike
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Mike Dusenberry
> >> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> >> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >> >
> >> > Sent from my iPhone.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Niketan Pansare <npansar@us.ibm.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !!
> >> > >
> >> > > I vote for #4.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > >
> >> > > Niketan Pansare
> >> > > IBM Almaden Research Center
> >> > > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> >> > > http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=
> >> us-npansar
> >> > >
> >> > > Deron Eriksson ---10/21/2016 12:57:25 PM---Given the overwhelming
> >> > support for #1, I give my +1 to #1. Deron
> >> > >
> >> > > From: Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com>
> >> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> >> > > Date: 10/21/2016 12:57 PM
> >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.
> >> > >
> >> > > Deron
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <
> >> jason.azares@gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I vote for #1
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> >> > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I
wasn't
> >> > expecting
> >> > > > > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Regards,
> >> > > > > Matthias
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes
the
> >> > features of
> >> > > > 3
> >> > > > >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others
here
> >> since
> >> > I
> >> > > > have
> >> > > > >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations
> >> involved
> >> > such
> >> > > > as
> >> > > > >> scalability.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement
of the
> >> ASF (
> >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics),
> >> > although I
> >> > > > >> don't know how strict this is.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Deron
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> >> > > > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> >> > > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd
prefer to
> >> > remove
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project
with no
> >> > > > intentions
> >> > > > >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo
has it too
> >> but
> >> > it's
> >> > > > >>> probably a different context, especially since there
are
> >> > discussions to
> >> > > > >>> add
> >> > > > >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> Regards,
> >> > > > >>> Matthias
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> +1 for 1
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson
<
> >> > > > >>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
> >> > > > >>>> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important
that full logo
> with
> >> > name
> >> > > > and
> >> > > > >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail
will get lost with
> the
> >> > other
> >> > > > 3,
> >> > > > >>>>> at
> >> > > > >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of
the simple and
> >> isometric
> >> > > > >>>>> versions.
> >> > > > >>>>> They make a great family.
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> ...........................
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> Jeremy Anderson
> >> > > > >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> >> > > > >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R
Reiss <
> >> > frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> >> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option
#4 myself.
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> Fred
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee
Mascarinas
> >> ---10/21/2016
> >> > > > >>>>>> 11:19:01
> >> > > > >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much!
+1 on option 1
> >> > because]Renee
> >> > > > >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love
these!!! thank
> >> you
> >> > so
> >> > > > >>>>>> much!
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> +1
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic
and fun!
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <renee.uxdesign@gmail.com>
> >> > > > >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> >> > > > >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> >> > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo
Ideas
> >> > > > >>>>>> ------------------------------
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic
and fun!
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose
Peng <
> >> > rosypenguin@gmail.com>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> google drive:
> >> > > > >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/
> >> d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> >> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
> >> > > > >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file
> >> /d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> >> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Rose
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM,
Felix Schüler <
> >> > > > fschueler@posteo.de>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Rose,
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was
removed - probably because
> of
> >> > size
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload
it somewhere else and share
> >> the
> >> > > > link?
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> Felix
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng
wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored
a few logo concepts, and we
> >> > would
> >> > > > love
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're
looking for a logo
> >> that
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> conveys
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with
a robot. The smile is
> >> > inspired
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> by a
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical
background
> of
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> SystemML.
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have
two main types of logo
> >> > > > explorations.
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> One
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and
the other is an
> >> isometric
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we
pulled out a few to show
> how
> >> > they
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> would
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache
SystemML".
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the
robot to have interchangeable
> >> parts
> >> > to
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability
of algorithms that
> >> SystemML
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> provides,
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> so
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen
it could still have
> >> several
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> variations.
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept
#1 for the minimal look, but
> >> we'd
> >> > > > love
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and
match or make other
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> suggestions
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute
of Technology
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> --
> >> > > > >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >> > > > >>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> >> > > > >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute
of Technology
> >> > > > >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Madison J. Myers*
> > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> >
> > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> >
> >    -
> >       LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Madison J. Myers*
> *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
>
> *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
>
>    -
>       LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message