systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Madison Myers <madisonjmy...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Date Fri, 21 Oct 2016 21:53:17 GMT
+1 for what Mike said! I'd say 1 is my favorite and 4 is my second
favorite. Would love to incorporate them all as suggested by Mike and
Jeremy.

These are really great, btw. Awesome work!

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeremy Anderson <jeremy@objectadjective.com
> wrote:

> +1 Mike.
>
> We're working on t-shirt designs, sticker designs, maybe buttons. Action
> figures would be really cool!
>
> ...........................
>
> Jeremy Anderson
> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
>
> On 21 October 2016 at 14:27, <dusenberrymw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I like all of these options!  I'll give a +1 for #1 as the main logo, and
> > I also think it would be great to make use of the rest of the designs
> > throughout the website and other project materials.
> >
> > Thanks!!
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mike Dusenberry
> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone.
> >
> >
> > > On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Niketan Pansare <npansar@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !!
> > >
> > > I vote for #4.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Niketan Pansare
> > > IBM Almaden Research Center
> > > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> > > http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
> > >
> > > Deron Eriksson ---10/21/2016 12:57:25 PM---Given the overwhelming
> > support for #1, I give my +1 to #1. Deron
> > >
> > > From: Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > Date: 10/21/2016 12:57 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.
> > >
> > > Deron
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <jason.azares@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I vote for #1
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't
> > expecting
> > > > > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the
> > features of
> > > > 3
> > > > >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here
> since
> > I
> > > > have
> > > > >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved
> > such
> > > > as
> > > > >> scalability.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the
> ASF (
> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics),
> > although I
> > > > >> don't know how strict this is.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Deron
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> > > > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to
> > remove
> > > > the
> > > > >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with
no
> > > > intentions
> > > > >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it
too
> but
> > it's
> > > > >>> probably a different context, especially since there are
> > discussions to
> > > > >>> add
> > > > >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Regards,
> > > > >>> Matthias
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> +1 for 1
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
> > > > >>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full
logo with
> > name
> > > > and
> > > > >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get
lost with the
> > other
> > > > 3,
> > > > >>>>> at
> > > > >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple
and
> isometric
> > > > >>>>> versions.
> > > > >>>>> They make a great family.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> ...........................
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Jeremy Anderson
> > > > >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > > > >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <
> > frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Fred
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas
> ---10/21/2016
> > > > >>>>>> 11:19:01
> > > > >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option
1
> > because]Renee
> > > > >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!!
thank you
> > so
> > > > >>>>>> much!
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> +1
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <renee.uxdesign@gmail.com>
> > > > >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > > > >>>>>> ------------------------------
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic
and fun!
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <
> > rosypenguin@gmail.com>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> google drive:
> > > > >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/
> 0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
> > > > >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/
> 0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>>>> Rose
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler
<
> > > > fschueler@posteo.de>
> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Rose,
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed
- probably because of
> > size
> > > > >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere
else and share
> the
> > > > link?
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Felix
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few
logo concepts, and we
> > would
> > > > love
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking
for a logo
> that
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> conveys
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot.
The smile is
> > inspired
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> by a
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical
background of
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> SystemML.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main
types of logo
> > > > explorations.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> One
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other
is an isometric
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled
out a few to show how
> > they
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> would
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to
have interchangeable parts
> > to
> > > > >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of
algorithms that SystemML
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> provides,
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> so
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could
still have
> several
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> variations.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for
the minimal look, but
> we'd
> > > > love
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or
make other
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> suggestions
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > > > >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > > > >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of
Technology
> > > > >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > > > >>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > > > >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > > > >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
*Madison J. Myers*
*UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*

*King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
*New York University, BA Political Science '12*

   -
      LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message