systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Date Thu, 06 Oct 2016 23:47:27 GMT
Looks like we are about ready for the next RC. Please let me know if not,
otherwise I will try to create a new RC later tonight.

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Acs S <acs_s@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

> +1
> -Arvind
>
>       From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <dusenberrymw@gmail.com>
>  To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>  Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 6:59 PM
>  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
> +1 for SYSTEMML-951
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 5, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > as the Python DSL is still in experimental status, I don't think that
> SYSTEMML-1013 is blocking the release. However, there is one more
> nice-to-have performance feature I'd like to include: SYSTEMML-951 (right
> indexing via lookup). If nobody objects, we could cut tomorrow once 951 is
> in; if somebody get's a chance to look into 1013 then we could include this
> too.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Acs S ---10/05/2016 12:19:57 PM---Imran has opened Jira 1013.  -Arvind
> >
> > From: Acs S <acs_s@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> apache.org>
> > Date: 10/05/2016 12:19 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Imran has opened Jira 1013.
> > -Arvind
> >
> >      From: Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> > ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been resolved too.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Acs S ---10/04/2016 05:30:52 PM---There is one more issue I am aware
> of:  Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure
> >
> > From: Acs S <acs_s@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> apache.org>
> > Date: 10/04/2016 05:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> > There is one more issue I am aware of:  Imran facing max recursion issue
> in toNumPyArray().Not sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need
> resolution for it.
> > -Arvind
> >      From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> > Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, <dusenberrymw@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From
> my
> > > end, we are ready to go.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008,
> there
> > > is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
> > > failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am
> waiting
> > > for
> > > >
> > > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please
> let
> > > me
> > > > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <dusenberrymw@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved,
> which is
> > > > > great!  However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn
> tests
> > > > > today that I want to look into before we cut.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm,
> but
> > > we
> > > > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to
> go.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the
> following
> > > > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
> > > https://issues.apache.or
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this
> thread,
> > > > > open:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that
> still
> > > need
> > > > > > to be handled here ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have
been
> > > resolved -
> > > > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
> > > 10:44:51
> > > > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved
too.
> > > > > Th]Matthias
> > > > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update:
> SYSTEMML-969
> > > has
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
The
> open
> > > > > issues
> > > > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995.
We
> > > should be
> > > > > able
> > > > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance
of
> testing a
> > > > > new RC
> > > > > > > over the weekend.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed
> (I
> > > added
> > > > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted
change
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Acs S <acs_s@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org"
> <dev@systemml.incubator.
> > > > > apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with
UTF
> support
> > > > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Arvind
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >    From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <dusenberrymw@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance
> for
> > > > > vector
> > > > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM
on
> > > SystemML
> > > > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to
work on.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <
> > > luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm
<
> > > mboehm@us.ibm.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still
waiting
> for
> > > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have
> feature
> > > we
> > > > > want
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe -
frame
> converter).
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > > > > Great progress !!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get
resolved
> and I
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > work
> > > > > > > > on RC2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/
> > > lresende1975>
> > > > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message