systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Date Mon, 03 Oct 2016 03:30:23 GMT
I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995

Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still need
to be handled here ?


On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been resolved -
> from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51
> PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. Th]Matthias
> Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been
> resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
>
> From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open issues
> are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We should be able
> to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a new RC
> over the weekend.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added
> changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
>
> From: Acs S <acs_s@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> >
> Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support
> Matthias added he reverted changes)
>
> -Arvind
>
>     From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <dusenberrymw@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
> I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for vector
> DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on SystemML
> matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature we want
> to
> >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter).
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> > Great progress !!!
> >
> > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I will
> work
> > on RC2.
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message