systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Renee Mascarinas <renee.uxdes...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Date Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:44:58 GMT
+1 to Morgan
#1 can scale really well and #4 would make a great mascot.  Thanks!

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Morgan Fritz <morganmfritz@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 for 1 and 4,
>
> 1 is great for a flat logo icon, for the top of the website, headers, etc.
> that can be scaled very small (and large)
> and
> 4 is perfect for the interactions throughout the website, and other
> animations, branding pieces, etc.
>
> We can definitely have a range of uses for iconography that can utilize
> more than one design!
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Nakul Jindal <nakul02@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for #1 - more professional and minimalist
> >
> > Second favorite is 3 or 4 - is more "fun" and conveys the idea of
> SystemML
> > being a "black box" and works well with the animation that Rose Peng
> worked
> > on.
> >
> > -Nakul
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers <madisonjmyers@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for SystemML action figures as well :D
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers <
> madisonjmyers@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for what Mike said! I'd say 1 is my favorite and 4 is my second
> > > > favorite. Would love to incorporate them all as suggested by Mike and
> > > > Jeremy.
> > > >
> > > > These are really great, btw. Awesome work!
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeremy Anderson <
> > > > jeremy@objectadjective.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 Mike.
> > > >>
> > > >> We're working on t-shirt designs, sticker designs, maybe buttons.
> > Action
> > > >> figures would be really cool!
> > > >>
> > > >> ...........................
> > > >>
> > > >> Jeremy Anderson
> > > >> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> > > >>
> > > >> On 21 October 2016 at 14:27, <dusenberrymw@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > I like all of these options!  I'll give a +1 for #1 as the main
> > logo,
> > > >> and
> > > >> > I also think it would be great to make use of the rest of the
> > designs
> > > >> > throughout the website and other project materials.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks!!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > -Mike
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Mike Dusenberry
> > > >> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > >> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Niketan Pansare <
> npansar@us.ibm.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !!
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I vote for #4.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Niketan Pansare
> > > >> > > IBM Almaden Research Center
> > > >> > > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> > > >> > > http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=
> > > >> us-npansar
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Deron Eriksson ---10/21/2016 12:57:25 PM---Given the
> overwhelming
> > > >> > support for #1, I give my +1 to #1. Deron
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > From: Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > >> > > Date: 10/21/2016 12:57 PM
> > > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Deron
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <
> > > >> jason.azares@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > I vote for #1
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> > > >> > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer
Deron, I
> > wasn't
> > > >> > expecting
> > > >> > > > > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Regards,
> > > >> > > > > Matthias
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained
eye likes the
> > > >> > features of
> > > >> > > > 3
> > > >> > > > >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements
of others
> here
> > > >> since
> > > >> > I
> > > >> > > > have
> > > >> > > > >> no training in design and the multitude of
considerations
> > > >> involved
> > > >> > such
> > > >> > > > as
> > > >> > > > >> scalability.
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> I believe the logo trademark is an official
requirement of
> > the
> > > >> ASF (
> > > >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics
> ),
> > > >> > although I
> > > >> > > > >> don't know how strict this is.
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> Deron
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias
Boehm <
> > > >> > > > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > > >> > > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options,
I'd prefer
> > to
> > > >> > remove
> > > >> > > > the
> > > >> > > > >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open
source project
> with
> > no
> > > >> > > > intentions
> > > >> > > > >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new
Spark logo has it
> > too
> > > >> but
> > > >> > it's
> > > >> > > > >>> probably a different context, especially
since there are
> > > >> > discussions to
> > > >> > > > >>> add
> > > >> > > > >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > >>> Regards,
> > > >> > > > >>> Matthias
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > >>> +1 for 1
> > > >> > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy
Anderson <
> > > >> > > > >>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
> > > >> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
> > > >> > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's
important that full logo
> > > with
> > > >> > name
> > > >> > > > and
> > > >> > > > >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned
detail will get lost
> with
> > > the
> > > >> > other
> > > >> > > > 3,
> > > >> > > > >>>>> at
> > > >> > > > >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use
all of the simple and
> > > >> isometric
> > > >> > > > >>>>> versions.
> > > >> > > > >>>>> They make a great family.
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> ...........................
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> Jeremy Anderson
> > > >> > > > >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > > >> > > > >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick
R Reiss <
> > > >> > frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a
fan of option #4 myself.
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> Fred
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details
for Renee Mascarinas
> > > >> ---10/21/2016
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> 11:19:01
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you
so much! +1 on option 1
> > > >> > because]Renee
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01
AM---love these!!!
> > thank
> > > >> you
> > > >> > so
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> much!
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> +1
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> on option 1 because it's both
minimalistic and fun!
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <renee.uxdesign@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML
New Logo Ideas
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> ------------------------------
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so
much!
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's
both minimalistic and fun!
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50
AM, Rose Peng <
> > > >> > rosypenguin@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> google drive:
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/
> > > >> d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file
> > > >> /d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these
work.
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> Rose
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at
8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <
> > > >> > > > fschueler@posteo.de>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Rose,
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment
was removed - probably
> because
> > > of
> > > >> > size
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> limitations. Could
you upload it somewhere else and
> > share
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > link?
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Felix
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02,
Rose Peng wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> The design team
has explored a few logo concepts,
> and
> > we
> > > >> > would
> > > >> > > > love
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> see which ideas you like the
most! We're looking for a
> > logo
> > > >> that
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> conveys
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> optimization, and we came
up with a robot. The smile
> is
> > > >> > inspired
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> by a
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind
the mathematical
> > background
> > > of
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> SystemML.
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> In the attached image,
we have two main types of logo
> > > >> > > > explorations.
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> One
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing
robot and the other is an
> > > >> isometric
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below
that we pulled out a few to
> show
> > > how
> > > >> > they
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> would
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> look as logos besides the words
"Apache SystemML".
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we
want the robot to have
> interchangeable
> > > >> parts
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> communicate the
customizability of algorithms that
> > > >> SystemML
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> provides,
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> so
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up
being chosen it could still have
> > > >> several
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> variations.
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Personally, we
like concept #1 for the minimal look,
> > but
> > > >> we'd
> > > >> > > > love
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> to
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free
to mix and match or make
> > other
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> suggestions
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> that we can take into
consideration.
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 -
Georgia Institute of Technology
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com
<http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> --
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia
Institute of Technology
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>>
> > > >> > > > >>>>
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Madison J. Myers*
> > > > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> > > >
> > > > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > > > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> > > >
> > > >    -
> > > >       LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Madison J. Myers*
> > > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17*
> > >
> > > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14*
> > > *New York University, BA Political Science '12*
> > >
> > >    -
> > >       LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message