systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From dusenberr...@gmail.com
Subject Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
Date Fri, 21 Oct 2016 21:27:56 GMT
I like all of these options!  I'll give a +1 for #1 as the main logo, and I also think it would
be great to make use of the rest of the designs throughout the website and other project materials.

Thanks!!

-Mike

--

Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry

Sent from my iPhone.


> On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Niketan Pansare <npansar@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !! 
> 
> I vote for #4.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Niketan Pansare
> IBM Almaden Research Center
> E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
> 
> Deron Eriksson ---10/21/2016 12:57:25 PM---Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give
my +1 to #1. Deron
> 
> From: Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 10/21/2016 12:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1.
> 
> Deron
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <jason.azares@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > I vote for #1
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't expecting
> > > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote:
> > >
> > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features of
> > 3
> > >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since I
> > have
> > >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved such
> > as
> > >> scalability.
> > >>
> > >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the ASF (
> > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics), although I
> > >> don't know how strict this is.
> > >>
> > >> Deron
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> > mboehm7@googlemail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to remove
> > the
> > >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no
> > intentions
> > >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too but
it's
> > >>> probably a different context, especially since there are discussions
to
> > >>> add
> > >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-)
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Matthias
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> +1 for 1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson <
> > >>>> jeremy@objectadjective.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1 on option 1 as well.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with
name
> > and
> > >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with
the other
> > 3,
> > >>>>> at
> > >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric
> > >>>>> versions.
> > >>>>> They make a great family.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ...........................
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Jeremy Anderson
> > >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> > >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <frreiss@us.ibm.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Fred
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016
> > >>>>>> 11:19:01
> > >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee
> > >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank
you so
> > >>>>>> much!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <renee.uxdesign@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM
> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas
> > >>>>>> ------------------------------
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <rosypenguin@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> google drive:
> > >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing
> > >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/
> > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>> Rose
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <
> > fschueler@posteo.de>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi Rose,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably
because of size
> > >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else
and share the
> > link?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Felix
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts,
and we would
> > love
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a
logo that
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> conveys
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile
is inspired
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> by a
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background
of
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> SystemML.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of
logo
> > explorations.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> One
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few
to show how they
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> would
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML".
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable
parts to
> > >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms
that SystemML
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> provides,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>> so
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have
several
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> variations.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal
look, but we'd
> > love
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> suggestions
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>> *Rose Peng*
> > >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology
> > >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> 
> 
> 

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, 7-Bit, 0 bytes)
View raw message