systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Date Thu, 06 Oct 2016 04:04:23 GMT
+1
-Arvind

      From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <dusenberrymw@gmail.com>
 To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 6:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
   
+1 for SYSTEMML-951

--

Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry

Sent from my iPhone.


> On Oct 5, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> as the Python DSL is still in experimental status, I don't think that SYSTEMML-1013 is
blocking the release. However, there is one more nice-to-have performance feature I'd like
to include: SYSTEMML-951 (right indexing via lookup). If nobody objects, we could cut tomorrow
once 951 is in; if somebody get's a chance to look into 1013 then we could include this too.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias 
> 
> Acs S ---10/05/2016 12:19:57 PM---Imran has opened Jira 1013.  -Arvind
> 
> From: Acs S <acs_s@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
> Date: 10/05/2016 12:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Imran has opened Jira 1013. 
> -Arvind
> 
>      From: Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>  
> ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been resolved too. 
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
> Acs S ---10/04/2016 05:30:52 PM---There is one more issue I am aware of:  Imran facing
max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure
> 
> From: Acs S <acs_s@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
> Date: 10/04/2016 05:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> 
> 
> 
> There is one more issue I am aware of:  Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not
sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need resolution for it.
> -Arvind
>      From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>  
> Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009.
> 
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, <dusenberrymw@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From my
> > end, we are ready to go.
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mike Dusenberry
> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone.
> >
> >
> > > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008, there
> > is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
> > failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am waiting
> > for
> > >
> > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let
> > me
> > > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <dusenberrymw@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, which is
> > > > great!  However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn tests
> > > > today that I want to look into before we cut.
> > > >
> > > > -Mike
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but
> > we
> > > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to go.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the following
> > > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
> > https://issues.apache.or
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread,
> > > > open:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > > > >
> > > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still
> > need
> > > > > to be handled here ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been
> > resolved -
> > > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
> > 10:44:51
> > > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> > > > Th]Matthias
> > > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969
> > has
> > > > been
> > > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The
open
> > > > issues
> > > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We
> > should be
> > > > able
> > > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing
a
> > > > new RC
> > > > > > over the weekend.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed
(I
> > added
> > > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Acs S <acs_s@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> > > > apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support
> > > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Arvind
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <dusenberrymw@gmail.com>
> > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance
for
> > > > vector
> > > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on
> > SystemML
> > > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work
on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <
> > luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <
> > mboehm@us.ibm.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still
waiting for
> > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have
feature
> > we
> > > > want
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame
converter).
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > > > Great progress !!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved
and I
> > > > will
> > > > > > work
> > > > > > > on RC2.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/
> > lresende1975>
> > > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 

   
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message