Mailing-List: contact dev-help@systemml.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML 0.11 release
References: <OF9922C2C3.00D82729-ON00257FFE.00208F8D-88257FFE.0021D5F7@notes.na.collabserv.com> <655836793.6984871.1469692556619.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <OF7C0DD50D.CC402CE4-ONC1257FFE.003095D4-88257FFE.003ACC17@notes.na.collabserv.com> <OFAE2A0C59.62E2923C-ON00257FFE.00546777-88257FFE.0054D501@notes.na.collabserv.com>
From: dusenberrymw@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary=Apple-Mail-EFBEC48F-B843-4979-A76B-6755A8A6623E
In-Reply-To: <OFAE2A0C59.62E2923C-ON00257FFE.00546777-88257FFE.0054D501@notes.na.collabserv.com>
Message-Id: <B3553BC4-891F-4F75-870D-0A0ACFF68B21@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:16:53 -0700
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
archived-at: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 16:17:03 -0000

--Apple-Mail-EFBEC48F-B843-4979-A76B-6755A8A6623E
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm definitely in favor of releasing as soon as possible, as well as moving t=
o quick release cycles.  In addition to adding 2.0 support, we should also s=
lim down our release artifacts to a single, simple distribution (in addition=
 to the required 'source' distribution) to make adoption easier.

-Mike

--

Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry

Sent from my iPhone.


> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:26 AM, Glenn Weidner <gweidner@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>=20
> Given that Spark 2.0 is officially released, we should also incorporate/ve=
rify compatibility with Spark 2.0 for SystemML 0.11 release.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Glenn
>=20
> Berthold Reinwald---07/28/2016 03:42:37 AM---Having a release with feature=
 complete frame support is a good idea. API completeness needs to be v
>=20
> From: Berthold Reinwald/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 07/28/2016 03:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML 0.11 release
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Having a release with feature complete frame support is a good idea. API=20=

> completeness needs to be verified.
>=20
> Regards,
> Berthold Reinwald
> IBM Almaden Research Center
> office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
> e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com
>=20
>=20
>=20
> From:   Acs S <acs_s@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> To:     "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org"=20
> <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
> Date:   07/28/2016 12:56 AM
> Subject:        Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML 0.11 release
>=20
>=20
>=20
> That makes sense.
> Going forward we should plan on having release at fix interval (+/- few=20=

> days) with some key features.Probably quarterly release will be one=20
> suggestion.
> -Arvind
>=20
>      From: Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> To: dev <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org>=20
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 11:09 PM
> Subject: [DISCUSS] SystemML 0.11 release
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Soon, we'll be done with the native frame support and various API changes.=

> This seems to be a good point in time to create our next 0.11 release.=20
> What
> do you think? In case the majority is in favor, let's collect the open
> features and issues here in this thread.
>=20
> Regards,
> Matthias
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20

--Apple-Mail-EFBEC48F-B843-4979-A76B-6755A8A6623E--