Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFC52009F9 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 19:50:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 0B829160A0E; Mon, 23 May 2016 17:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 552C6160A05 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 19:50:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 25235 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2016 17:50:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@systemml.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 25222 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2016 17:50:24 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2016 17:50:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A4ECB1A05C1 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 17:50:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.471 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.471 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.282, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HhJFrzyJ2PdP for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 17:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3A36060D43 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 17:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j1so52015943oih.3 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:50:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=683SNVDYMvAf+5hzfOAGW5eqrG1uE7U56uAUf9UHofk=; b=tIL8R6mZMs1OSSHa9etnxgjC0i8INLXV+kaVlL1CFb6PG3MeKY3GOAbmzFjVhTUCku Qdv5DSwHFTFlT3KD+2nYW6P+hiT6IyRuerIsHEStVZaZGgC3u04BGOW3IBqBSYm7SOCY 7aI4Xmcn5O8SFywXuYWOx6VYXX45QafBZpzSjL21dP2v2nDN9T33MfVnxtByAmYKLkh4 4PU2AGBCYs0M2nV1z4sBENzXnDfPxvW+e57rF5yV2GLgTomIs4LQX1V+qYrwgRhjRDkU TMn+2A8tc7svWz+39JnQqIE0WeNLXUhP8zxmlQU9A5cicR+MpMHoVER3ZVICCGcw4CnH AEKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=683SNVDYMvAf+5hzfOAGW5eqrG1uE7U56uAUf9UHofk=; b=F2cc2pW2L514aFjpKZ6mMYa2JVZFlZ+Gmq1DeDXuhliG2A5zrFvBQEnQTkojOOashw DjzSO3x54TA0Hl9J6fEVYU6+mSXf8mcIeVaMZBunIZn53RW1q82cQTQz8zA8+TcbFhGb DWv3lscdAIoOSTiROAF2fPDcBEPoKK14cCsfyQ0UmwFSpfbjvoooCRpkVSFx5H+KFXrV hcq8Ba1j588aayJHCsaiQdPnhCNJLxpkal10WVXy0y1hBIx7KemT5t0ELG4olVaAy0Br o3aVwwza/v5ma4ilbCFoBEGyLn+sNvTiFE/LEKpfdgP69Y/x0WytmZ0azT2YJ2kuJTK2 Mogg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJx9CZnnIJMoVA9aVn1fPF3sF6THUt1mNNVcAYDXc/BPTdG1H8o5ZiUG5fsjTTmvE+DfUxWLhb5Rl6OEA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.157.11.103 with SMTP id p36mr54653otd.21.1464025821065; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.44.19 with HTTP; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:50:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160523174332.8F9ACAE034@b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com> References: <20160523174332.8F9ACAE034@b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 10:50:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: branch for 0.10? From: Deron Eriksson To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135d10801b93805338613db archived-at: Mon, 23 May 2016 17:50:26 -0000 --001a1135d10801b93805338613db Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Fred and Luciano, Branching after the 0.10 release candidate is ready sounds good. I think the current 0.11.0-SNAPSHOT in the pom might be a little confusing though since it might be interpreted as meaning it's OK to start checking 0.11 code into master. Deron On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Frederick R Reiss wrote: > I'd say wait until we have a final 0.1.0 release candidate, then branch. I > don't believe anyone has any open PRs that need to go into the trunk right > away. > > Fred > > [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---05/23/2016 10:31:15 > AM---Should there be a branch-0.10 on GitHub? The current pom.x]Deron > Eriksson ---05/23/2016 10:31:15 AM---Should there be a branch-0.10 on > GitHub? The current pom.xml on master is referring to the 0.11.0-SN > > From: Deron Eriksson > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Date: 05/23/2016 10:31 AM > Subject: branch for 0.10? > ------------------------------ > > > > Should there be a branch-0.10 on GitHub? The current pom.xml on master is > referring to the 0.11.0-SNAPSHOT. > > Deron > > > > --001a1135d10801b93805338613db--