systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: missing release candidate checksums?
Date Wed, 25 May 2016 18:17:45 GMT
Thanks, they should all be on the staging site now.

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> and maybe:
> ? systemml-0.10.0-incubating.pom.md5
>
> Also, the previous release had sha1 checksums. Do we need those too or is
> that overkill?
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I noticed that not all the artifacts at
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/
> > > have md5 checksums.
> > >
> > > Also, the previous release (see
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/systemml/systemml/0.9.0-incubating/
> > > )
> > > featured sha1 checksums but the current release candidate doesn't have
> > sha1
> > > checksums.
> > >
> > > Deron
> > >
> >
> >
> > Are these the only ones missing ?
> >
> > ?       systemml-0.10.0-incubating-inmemory.jar.md5
> > ?       systemml-0.10.0-incubating-javadoc.jar.md5
> > ?       systemml-0.10.0-incubating-sources.jar.md5
> > ?       systemml-0.10.0-incubating-standalone.jar.md5
> > ?       systemml-0.10.0-incubating.jar.md5
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message