Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-systemml-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-systemml-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C50618E8B for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88279 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2016 19:17:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-systemml-dev-archive@systemml.apache.org Received: (qmail 88235 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2016 19:17:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@systemml.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88184 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2016 19:17:22 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 19:17:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id AFB77C084C for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:17:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.649 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.649 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.282, HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_LIVE=1, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY=1.996, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.329, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_MID=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hyil-2OdYzTa for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e17.ny.us.ibm.com (e17.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.207]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 96E7520976 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost by e17.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:17:20 -0500 Received: from d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (9.56.250.166) by e17.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.204) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:17:18 -0500 X-IBM-Helo: d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: frreiss@us.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.23]) by d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019C238C8026 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:17:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from d01av05.pok.ibm.com (d01av05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.195]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u19JHGhZ29360244 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:17:16 GMT Received: from d01av05.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av05.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u19JE3v4010633 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:14:03 -0500 Received: from d50lp01.ny.us.ibm.com (d50lp01.pok.ibm.com [146.89.104.207]) by d01av05.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id u19JE3LR010617 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:14:03 -0500 Message-Id: <201602091914.u19JE3LR010617@d01av05.pok.ibm.com> Received: from /spool/local by d50lp01.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:17:16 -0500 Received: from smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (192.155.248.72) by d50lp01.ny.us.ibm.com (158.87.18.20) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256/256) Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:17:12 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP for from ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:17:11 -0000 Received: from us1a3-smtp02.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com (10.106.154.103) by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (10.106.227.158) with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:17:09 -0000 Received: from us1a3-mail143.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com ([10.146.38.121]) by us1a3-smtp02.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com with ESMTP id 2016020919190230-327309 ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:19:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Project folder structure To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org From: "Frederick R Reiss" Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:15:37 -0800 References: X-KeepSent: D28F6ABB:42F44B51-88257F54:00698109; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0.1EXT September 15, 2015 X-LLNOutbound: False X-Disclaimed: 28779 X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 Content-type: multipart/related; Boundary="0__=07BBF5C7DFFA07998f9e8a93df938690918c07BBF5C7DFFA0799" x-cbid: 16020919-0041-0000-0000-0000033BFF30 X-IBM-ISS-SpamDetectors: Score=0.371236; BY=0.294018; FL=0; FP=0; FZ=0; HX=0; KW=0; PH=0; SC=0.371236; ST=0; TS=0; UL=0; ISC= X-IBM-ISS-DetailInfo: BY=3.00004898; HX=3.00000240; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000142; SDB=6.00657572; UDB=6.00298425; UTC=2016-02-09 19:17:10 x-cbparentid: 16020919-5090-0000-0000-0000070E0106 X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER --0__=07BBF5C7DFFA07998f9e8a93df938690918c07BBF5C7DFFA0799 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="1__=07BBF5C7DFFA07998f9e8a93df938690918c07BBF5C7DFFA0799" --1__=07BBF5C7DFFA07998f9e8a93df938690918c07BBF5C7DFFA0799 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sounds like a good idea to me. In the spirit of Maven, the algorithms really should go under src/main/dml and src/main/pydml. Perhaps we should add some deep links to the top-level readme.md for important files that we need to keep in nested directories? Fred From: Luciano Resende To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 02/09/2016 11:11 AM Subject: Project folder structure I would like to propose we follow more closely the project structure Spark is using, where we clearly define a folder for samples, another for dev utilities, etc instead of getting everything buried inside the /scripts folder where it might be confusing/hard for users to find what they are looking for. Also, I would like to suggest creating a README.md on some of these folders (e.g. samples) that describes what the contents of the folder are. Thoughts ? -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --1__=07BBF5C7DFFA07998f9e8a93df938690918c07BBF5C7DFFA0799 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline

Sounds like a good idea to me. In the spirit of Maven, the a= lgorithms really should go under src/main/dml and src/main/pydml. Perhaps w= e should add some deep links to the top-level readme.md for important files= that we need to keep in nested directories?

Fred
3D"InactiveLuciano Resende ---02/09/2016 11:11:23 AM---I w= ould like to propose we follow more closely the project structure Spark is = using, where we clearl

Fro= m: Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com&= gt;
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 02/09/2016 11:11 AM
Subject: Project folder structure





I would like = to propose we follow more closely the project structure Spark
is using, = where we clearly define a folder for samples, another for dev
utilities,= etc instead of getting everything buried  inside the /scripts
fold= er where it might be confusing/hard for users to find what they are
look= ing for.

Also, I would like to suggest creating a README.md on some = of these folders
(e.g. samples) that describes what the contents of the = folder are.

Thoughts ?

--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lrese= nde
ht= tp://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/


--1__=07BBF5C7DFFA07998f9e8a93df938690918c07BBF5C7DFFA0799-- --0__=07BBF5C7DFFA07998f9e8a93df938690918c07BBF5C7DFFA0799--