Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-systemml-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-systemml-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B02CA1839B for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 04:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34226 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2016 04:41:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-systemml-dev-archive@systemml.apache.org Received: (qmail 34181 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2016 04:41:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@systemml.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 34170 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2016 04:41:34 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 04:41:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A7483C26C9 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 04:41:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 5.997 X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.997 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=3, KAM_LIVE=1, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY=1.996, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_MID=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UPLfNg-RPmHR for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 04:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e18.ny.us.ibm.com (e18.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.208]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 6B3BF20B91 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 04:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost by e18.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:41:17 -0500 Received: from d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (9.56.250.168) by e18.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.205) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:41:16 -0500 X-IBM-Helo: d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: mboehm@us.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.27]) by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AD6C9003E for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:41:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u0I4fFAV29687984 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 04:41:16 GMT Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u0I4fFwK017620 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:41:15 -0500 Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com (e39.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.249.49]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id u0I4fEod017580 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:41:15 -0500 Message-Id: <201601180441.u0I4fEod017580@d01av04.pok.ibm.com> Received: from localhost by e39.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 21:41:14 -0700 Received: from smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (192.155.248.66) by e39.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.2.139) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256/256) Sun, 17 Jan 2016 21:41:13 -0700 X-IBM-Helo: smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com X-IBM-MailFrom: mboehm@us.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Received: from /spool/local by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP for from ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 04:41:12 -0000 Received: from us1a3-smtp01.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com (10.106.154.100) by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (10.106.227.127) with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 04:41:10 -0000 Received: from us1a3-mail149.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com ([10.146.38.84]) by us1a3-smtp01.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com with ESMTP id 2016011804421437-15535 ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 04:42:14 +0000 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org From: "Matthias Boehm" Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:41:07 -0800 References: <201601111901.u0BJ1fhD010352@d03av04.boulder.ibm.com><201601151956.u0FJuTmQ028173@d01av03.pok.ibm.com><201601152011.u0FKB8p2008129@d03av05.boulder.ibm.com> X-KeepSent: CE1610E9:AFB39EE6-00257F3E:00186FE1; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0.1FP2 SHF37 August 25, 2014 X-LLNOutbound: False X-Disclaimed: 12095 X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 Content-type: multipart/related; Boundary="0__=8FBBF5ADDF8BE9718f9e8a93df938690918c8FBBF5ADDF8BE971" x-cbid: 16011804-0045-0000-0000-000003173508 X-IBM-ISS-SpamDetectors: Score=0.367945; BY=0.294066; FL=0; FP=0; FZ=0; HX=0; KW=0; PH=0; SC=0.367945; ST=0; TS=0; UL=0; ISC= X-IBM-ISS-DetailInfo: BY=3.00004805; HX=3.00000239; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000133; SDB=6.00646869; UDB=6.00292014; UTC=2016-01-18 04:41:11 x-cbparentid: 16011804-9588-0000-0000-00000190AE8B X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER --0__=8FBBF5ADDF8BE9718f9e8a93df938690918c8FBBF5ADDF8BE971 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="1__=8FBBF5ADDF8BE9718f9e8a93df938690918c8FBBF5ADDF8BE971" --1__=8FBBF5ADDF8BE9718f9e8a93df938690918c8FBBF5ADDF8BE971 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII In my opinion, our release process takes too long but that's ok for the second release - we just need to improve upon it. Instead of waiting for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11084, I would suggest to create a branch for 0.9 and move on. This would also be useful for pure maintenance releases we want to do. So maybe we could make this a general policy. Any objections? Regards, Matthias From: Deron Eriksson To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 01/15/2016 01:52 PM Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release Regarding the documentation, if analytics=5Fon in docs/=5Fconfig.yml is set= to false when jekyll is run, then analytics is not added to the rendered HTML, which would probably be a good idea for docs in a packaged release (if the documentation site is packaged with the release). Additionally, SYSTEMML=5FVERSION in docs/=5Fconfig.yml sets the SystemML version references in the rendered HTML, so it should be set to 0.9 when docs are generated for a release. Deron On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote: > If docs are included in the release distributions, it would be nice if > they were the generated (mostly) HTML documentation in docs/=5Fsite after > running jekyll. This would give users a complete set of documentation for > the release. This includes the aforementioned Algorithms Reference pdf and > all of the documentation currently available online. > > Deron > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Deron Eriksson > wrote: > >> Hi Luciano, >> >> WRT docs, it would be nice to have a snapshot of the generated >> documentation site (like http://apache.github.io/incubator-systemml/). >> This allows a historical display of documentation similar to Spark ( >> http://spark.apache.org/documentation.html). If that is available >> online, is it necessary to package the Algorithms Reference PDF or README >> with the releases? Also, the docs/README.md describes generating the >> documentation site from markdown using jekyll so I'm not sure if that would >> help anyone if the *.md files aren't included in the release distributions. >> Or is this a different README? >> >> Deron >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Matthias Boehm >> wrote: >> >>> great - thanks Niketan. From my perspective, we're also good to go. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Matthias >>> >>> [image: Inactive hide details for Niketan Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55 >>> AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this we]Niketan >>> Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55 AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance >>> experiments this week and the release >>> >>> From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS >>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org >>> Date: 01/15/2016 11:56 AM >>> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this week and the release >>> SystemML 0.9 looks good to me :) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Niketan Pansare >>> IBM Almaden Research Center >>> E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com >>> *http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=3Dus-npansar* >>> >>> >>> Mike Dusenberry ---01/14/2016 06:49:31 PM---The DML Language Reference >>> would be great to have as well. Also, in general, I think we should only >>> >>> From: Mike Dusenberry >>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org >>> Date: 01/14/2016 06:49 PM >>> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >>> The DML Language Reference would be great to have as well. >>> >>> Also, in general, I think we should only have the Javadocs for end-user >>> facing code, such MLContext, rather than for any deep internals that a >>> user >>> is not going to interact with. >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM Luciano Resende >>> wrote: >>> >>> > What should be the minimum documentation to add to the release >>> distribution >>> > ? >>> > >>> > Currently we have : >>> > docs/README.txt >>> > docs/SysteML=5FAlgorithms=5FReference.pdf >>> > >>> > I was planning to add the javadocs as well. >>> > >>> > But I still think we have much more available in trunk that we could >>> add... >>> > >>> > Suggestions are welcome... >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende < >>> luckbr1975@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query : >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=3Dproject%20%3D%20S= YSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20= %3E%3D%202015-10-27* >>> < https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=3Dproject%20%3D%20SY= STEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%= 3E%3D%202015-10-27 > >>> > > >>> > > And was wondering if we could all move this to 0.9 release. >>> > > >>> > > Could someone please help me verify. >>> > > >>> > > Thanks >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende < >>> luckbr1975@gmail.com> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm >> > >>> > >> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close >>> the >>> > >>> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version >>> number >>> > 0.9 >>> > >>> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as >>> > many >>> > >>> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think >>> > about >>> > >>> release branches. >>> > >>> >>> > >> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a >>> 0.9.1 >>> > >> for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming >>> very >>> > >> quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor >>> > releases. >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> -- >>> > >> Luciano Resende >>> > >> *http://people.apache.org/~lresende* >>> >>> > >> *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* >>> > >> *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Luciano Resende >>> > > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende* >>> >>> > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* >>> > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Luciano Resende >>> > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende* >>> >>> > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* >>> > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* >>> > >>> -- >>> Mike Dusenberry >>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw >>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > --1__=8FBBF5ADDF8BE9718f9e8a93df938690918c8FBBF5ADDF8BE971 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline

In my opinion, our release process takes too long but that's= ok for the second release - we just need to improve upon it. Instead of wa= iting for htt= ps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11084, I would suggest to crea= te a branch for 0.9 and move on. This would also be useful for pure mainten= ance releases we want to do. So maybe we could make this a general policy. = Any objections?

Regards,
Matthias


3D"InactiveDeron Eriksson ---01/15/2016 01:52:05 PM---Rega= rding the documentation, if analytics=5Fon in docs/=5Fconfig.yml is set to = false when jekyll is run,

= From: Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail= .com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 01/15/2016 01:52 PM<= /font>
Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release




Regarding the documentation, if analytics=5Fon in docs/=5Fconfig.yml is se= t to
false when jekyll is run, then analytics is not added to the render= ed HTML,
which would probably be a good idea for docs in a packaged rele= ase (if the
documentation site is packaged with the release).
Additio= nally, SYSTEMML=5FVERSION in docs/=5Fconfig.yml sets the SystemML
versio= n references in the rendered HTML, so it should be set to 0.9 when
docs = are generated for a release.

Deron




On Fri, Jan 15= , 2016 at 1:16 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com>
wrote:=

> If docs are included in the release distributions, it would be= nice if
> they were the generated (mostly) HTML documentation in doc= s/=5Fsite after
> running jekyll. This would give users a complete se= t of documentation for
> the release. This includes the aforementione= d Algorithms Reference pdf and
> all of the documentation currently a= vailable online.
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Fri, Jan = 15, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com>
>= wrote:
>
>> Hi Luciano,
>>
>> WRT docs, i= t would be nice to have a snapshot of the generated
>> documentati= on site (like http://apache.github.io/incubator-systemml/).
>> = This allows a historical display of documentation similar to Spark (
>= ;> http:= //spark.apache.org/documentation.html). If that is available>> online, is it necessary to package the Algorithms Reference PDF = or README
>> with the releases? Also, the docs/README.md describes= generating the
>> documentation site from markdown using jekyll s= o I'm not sure if that would
>> help anyone if the *.md files aren= 't included in the release distributions.
>> Or is this a differen= t README?
>>
>> Deron
>>
>>
>>= On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com>=
>> wrote:
>>
>>> great - thanks Niketan. Fro= m my perspective, we're also good to go.
>>>
>>> Re= gards,
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> [image: Ina= ctive hide details for Niketan Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55
>>>= ; AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this we]Niketan>>> Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55 AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran som= e performance
>>> experiments this week and the release
>= >>
>>> From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
>>= ;> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>>> Date: 01/15/201= 6 11:56 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
= >>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>=
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As= FYI, I ran some performance experiments this week and the release
>&= gt;> SystemML 0.9 looks good to me :)
>>>
>>> Th= anks,
>>>
>>> Niketan Pansare
>>> IBM A= lmaden Research Center
>>> E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
>= ;>> *http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=3Dus= -npansar*
>>> <http://researcher.watson.i= bm.com/researcher/view.php?person=3Dus-npansar>
>>= >
>>> Mike Dusenberry ---01/14/2016 06:49:31 PM---The DML La= nguage Reference
>>> would be great to have as well. Also, in g= eneral, I think we should only
>>>
>>> From: Mike D= usenberry <dusenberrymw@gmail.com>
>>> To: dev@systemml.i= ncubator.apache.org
>>> Date: 01/14/2016 06:49 PM
>>&g= t; Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
>>> -----------= -------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>= >> The DML Language Reference would be great to have as well.
>= >>
>>> Also, in general, I think we should only have the = Javadocs for end-user
>>> facing code, such MLContext, rather t= han for any deep internals that a
>>> user
>>> is n= ot going to interact with.
>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM = Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>= >>
>>> > What should be the minimum documentation to a= dd to the release
>>> distribution
>>> > ?
&g= t;>> >
>>> > Currently we have :
>>> &g= t; docs/README.txt
>>> > docs/SysteML=5FAlgorithms=5FReferen= ce.pdf
>>> >
>>> > I was planning to add the = javadocs as well.
>>> >
>>> > But I still thi= nk we have much more available in trunk that we could
>>> add..= .
>>> >
>>> > Suggestions are welcome...
&= gt;>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jan 11, = 2016 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende <
>>> luckbr1975@gmail.com= >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > = > Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query :
>>> >= ; >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> = >
>>> *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jq= l=3Dproject%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%= 29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27*
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-3= 76?jql=3Dproject%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Cl= osed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27>
>>&= gt; > >
>>> > > And was wondering if we could all m= ove this to 0.9 release.
>>> > >
>>> > >= ; Could someone please help me verify.
>>> > >
>>= ;> > > Thanks
>>> > >
>>> > ><= br>>>> > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende= <
>>> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
>>> > > wr= ote:
>>> > >
>>> > >>
>>>= ; > >>
>>> > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01= AM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com
>>> >
>>&= gt; > >> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> >= >>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and cl= ose
>>> the
>>> > >>> release. Until th= at point, please no new features. The version
>>> number
>= ;>> > 0.9
>>> > >>> is fine with me since = it's not really a pure maintenance release as
>>> > many
= >>> > >>> new features went in too. Down the road, how= ever, we need to think
>>> > about
>>> > >= >> release branches.
>>> > >>>
>>>= ; > >> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we= need a
>>> 0.9.1
>>> > >> for example. As= we are not a large project with tens of prs coming
>>> very>>> > >> quick, I would recommend to create the branch a= s needed for minor
>>> > releases.
>>> > >= >
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>= ;> > >> --
>>> > >> Luciano Resende
>= ;>> > >> *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
>>>= ; <http://people= .apache.org/~lresende>
>>> > >> *http:= //twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>>> = > >> *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > = >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>>= > > Luciano Resende
>>> > > *http://people.apache.= org/~lresende*
>>> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
>= >> > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>>> > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.c= om/>
>>> > >
>>> >
>= >> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> = > Luciano Resende
>>> > *http://people.apache.org/~lresen= de*
>>> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
>>> &g= t; *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>= >> > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>>>> >
>>> --
>>> Mike Dusenberry
&g= t;>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
>>> LinkedIn: linked= in.com/in/mikedusenberry
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhon= e.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>&= gt;
>


--1__=8FBBF5ADDF8BE9718f9e8a93df938690918c8FBBF5ADDF8BE971-- --0__=8FBBF5ADDF8BE9718f9e8a93df938690918c8FBBF5ADDF8BE971--