systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Date Fri, 15 Jan 2016 21:16:41 GMT
If docs are included in the release distributions, it would be nice if they
were the generated (mostly) HTML documentation in docs/_site after running
jekyll. This would give users a complete set of documentation for the
release. This includes the aforementioned Algorithms Reference pdf and all
of the documentation currently available online.

Deron


On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Luciano,
>
> WRT docs, it would be nice to have a snapshot of the generated
> documentation site (like http://apache.github.io/incubator-systemml/).
> This allows a historical display of documentation similar to Spark (
> http://spark.apache.org/documentation.html). If that is available online,
> is it necessary to package the Algorithms Reference PDF or README with the
> releases? Also, the docs/README.md describes generating the documentation
> site from markdown using jekyll so I'm not sure if that would help anyone
> if the *.md files aren't included in the release distributions. Or is this
> a different README?
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
>> great - thanks Niketan. From my perspective, we're also good to go.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>> [image: Inactive hide details for Niketan Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55
>> AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this we]Niketan
>> Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55 AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance
>> experiments this week and the release
>>
>> From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>> Date: 01/15/2016 11:56 AM
>> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this week and the release
>> SystemML 0.9 looks good to me :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Niketan Pansare
>> IBM Almaden Research Center
>> E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
>> *http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar*
>> <http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar>
>>
>> Mike Dusenberry ---01/14/2016 06:49:31 PM---The DML Language Reference
>> would be great to have as well. Also, in general, I think we should only
>>
>> From: Mike Dusenberry <dusenberrymw@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>> Date: 01/14/2016 06:49 PM
>> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> The DML Language Reference would be great to have as well.
>>
>> Also, in general, I think we should only have the Javadocs for end-user
>> facing code, such MLContext, rather than for any deep internals that a
>> user
>> is not going to interact with.
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > What should be the minimum documentation to add to the release
>> distribution
>> > ?
>> >
>> > Currently we have :
>> > docs/README.txt
>> > docs/SysteML_Algorithms_Reference.pdf
>> >
>> > I was planning to add the javadocs as well.
>> >
>> > But I still think we have much more available in trunk that we could
>> add...
>> >
>> > Suggestions are welcome...
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query :
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27*
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27>
>> > >
>> > > And was wondering if we could all move this to 0.9 release.
>> > >
>> > > Could someone please help me verify.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende <
>> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close
the
>> > >>> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version
>> number
>> > 0.9
>> > >>> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release
as
>> > many
>> > >>> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think
>> > about
>> > >>> release branches.
>> > >>>
>> > >> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a
>> 0.9.1
>> > >> for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming
>> very
>> > >> quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor
>> > releases.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Luciano Resende
>> > >> *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
>> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
>> > >> *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>> > >> *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Luciano Resende
>> > > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
>> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
>> > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>> > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Luciano Resende
>> > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
>> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
>> > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>> > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>> >
>> --
>> Mike Dusenberry
>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message