Mailing-List: contact dev-help@systemml.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201511201953.tAKJrIMW015230@d01av02.pok.ibm.com>
References: 
 <CAGU5spf7ych_xQ78n2qZG+qgv6nt7hfREbhthk0DHao1TpmQcw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFb0PM41GFOs81ZgB7EH3pz3-diFTcOxMFrMcTPmDtE9_Uquvg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO1aQR-9VwUqw_iC-SdC18pSuKfBfvTgXYCvaGPmEx84hcH0-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<201511201953.tAKJrIMW015230@d01av02.pok.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:38:38 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAO1aQR90f2G6G14PwrF8O_shUSFgpCSUAxa1k0GL49+D6sLG_A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Next SystemML Release
From: Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01536886c86bac0524ffb2d7

--089e01536886c86bac0524ffb2d7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

With regards to package refactoring, I think short package names are great,
unless there is an Apache expectation for the full project name to be in
the package. Luciano, are you aware any standards in regards to this?  I
would highly favor org.apache.sysml over org.apache.dml, since (1) sysml
reflects the project name, and (2) DML has very strongly entrenched meaning
in the database world.

Deron


On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> first week of December for our 0.8.1 release sounds good to me.
>
> Apart from bug fixes and performance features, the focus should be mostly
> on increasing robustness of our spark backend. Since 0.8.0, we already
> added important features like "partitioned broadcasts" (in order to
> overcome the 2GB broadcast limitation) and "improved guarded collect" (to
> overcome OOM situations on RDD collect). There are still some open issues
> w/ regard to (1) potential OOMs, (2) repeated lazy evaluation of common
> subexpressions, and (3) data converter utils for external formats.
> Resolving these known issues would be a nice cut for this minor release.
>
> Regarding the package refactoring, I agree that we should do this right
> away; I would, however, prefer a short package name such as
> 'org.apache.dml' or 'org.apache.sysml'.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Deron Eriksson ---11/20/2015 11:09:51
> AM---Hello, Now that SystemML is an Apache Incubator project, t]Deron
> Eriksson ---11/20/2015 11:09:51 AM---Hello, Now that SystemML is an Apache
> Incubator project, the packages need to be
>
> From: Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 11/20/2015 11:09 AM
> Subject: Re: Next SystemML Release
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Now that SystemML is an Apache Incubator project, the packages need to be
> updated, right? (com.ibm.bi.dml.* to org.apache.systemml.*) Since the
> project just moved to its new repo, it would probably be a good time to
> make this update since this would minimize impact on developers. This
> affects all Java files in the project.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Shirish Tatikonda <
> shirish.tatikonda@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Luciano,
> >
> > First week of December sounds good. That should give sufficient time to
> fix
> > a few known issues.
> >
> > Shirish
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to get our first official Apache release soon, which will
> > > incorporate minor bug fixes and anything else post our 0.8.0 release.
> > Any
> > > other big enhancement we should target for this release ?
> > >
> > > How about targeting to cut a release in the first week of December ?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
>
>
>

--089e01536886c86bac0524ffb2d7--