From dev-return-18110-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@syncope.apache.org Mon Dec 16 14:16:37 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C216180658 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:16:37 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 15153 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2019 14:16:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@syncope.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@syncope.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@syncope.apache.org Received: (qmail 15141 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2019 14:16:36 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:16:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4C081C035F for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:16:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.584 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.584 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.2, KAM_DMARC_STATUS=0.01, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-he-de.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQux0ZuZ4uWz for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Softfail (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=93.34.9.207; helo=rovere.tirasa.net; envelope-from=skylark17@apache.org; receiver= Received: from rovere.tirasa.net (smtp.tirasa.net [93.34.9.207]) by mx1-he-de.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-he-de.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 2175D7DDAC for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rovere.tirasa.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1391A3C0A8C36 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:16:27 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tirasa.net Received: from rovere.tirasa.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rovere.tirasa.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Bii4bE-cizlz for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:16:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.185] (unknown [192.168.0.185]) (Authenticated sender: matteo.alessandroni@tirasa.net) by rovere.tirasa.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D819C3C0A8C1A for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:16:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Joining the OpenJDK Quality Outreach initiative To: dev@syncope.apache.org References: <7ef28054-454e-9130-be66-80f9ec864ada@apache.org> From: Matteo Alessandroni Message-ID: <4329332b-0e80-7788-d1ce-f0f657e7a084@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:16:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7ef28054-454e-9130-be66-80f9ec864ada@apache.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------6BEA1EFDB4C4D4C9CA84AE2F" Content-Language: en-US --------------6BEA1EFDB4C4D4C9CA84AE2F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, +1 for me! Regards, Matteo On 16/12/19 13:09, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > Hi all, > we have the chance to join the OpenJDK Quality Outreach initiative [1]. > > They try to encourage popular open source projects to test their releases on latest OpenJDK Early Access builds (i.e. JDK 14 -ea, atm), by providing them with regular information describing new builds, their features, and making sure that their bug reports and feedback land in the right hands. So in that sense, being able to expand the set of projects testing against the latest JDK Early Access builds across many domains > can help detect issues that would otherwise be only detected once a release is shipped. > > As you can see from [1], there are several ASF projects listed there, so I believe there is nothing preventing us to do so. > > Since our master branch builds are based on OpenJDK 11, I think the only requirement left would be to set up a CI job  against OpenJDK 14-EA, which is definitely something we can afford. > > WDYT? > Regards. > > [1] https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/quality/Quality+Outreach > --------------6BEA1EFDB4C4D4C9CA84AE2F--