syncope-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Massimilino Perrone <massimiliano.perr...@tirasa.net>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Next release(s)
Date Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:41:27 GMT


Il 21/12/2015 16:36, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
> Hi all,
> if nobody has nothing against it, I am planning to prepare the VOTE 
> for 2.0.0-M1 on Wednesday morning (around 8.00am CET).
>
> For all people working on master branch: please be sure to commit 
> everything self-containing and working in the next 24 hours; after 
> that we will enter in a sort of "commit freeze" until the VOTE e-mail 
> is sent out, ok?

+1

>
> Regards.
>
> On 16/12/2015 18:56, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>> On 16 December 2015 18:09:11 CET, "Francesco Chicchiriccò" 
>> <ilgrosso@apache.org> wrote:
>>> HI there,
>>> as you might have noticed from the considerable e-mail flow, I have
>>> renamed 2.0.0 to 2.0.0-M1, created 2.0.0 and 2.1.0, and redistributed
>>> the open issues according to the discussion below.
>>>
>>> The target is to attempt to release 2.0.0-M1 around Christmas -
>>> interesting the idea of Santa bringing the first release of Syncope
>>> 2.0.0 under the Christmas tree :-)
>> Forgot to add: here's the prospect of new website:
>>
>> http://syncope.apache.org/2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>> On 20/11/2015 13:18, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>>>> Sorry, a late +1 from me. Francesco, I'm happy to help with
>>>> reviewing/correcting any documentation - I don't have the time right
>>> now
>>>> unfortunately to write any from scratch.
>>>>
>>>> Colm.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:10 AM, andrea
>>> <andrea.patricelli@tirasa.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Il 11/11/2015 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/11/2015 09:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> this discussion is triggered by some request recently received
on
>>> user@
>>>>>>> [1] but also about the ongoing development effort towards 2.0.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> AFAICT, the current status can be summarized as follows:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    1. feature-wise, core is currently in a quite self-consistent
>>> state,
>>>>>>> even tough relevant new feature are ATM set to be implemented
in
>>> 2.0.0
>>>>>>> (mainly SYNCOPE-699 / SYNCOPE-129 / SYNCOPE-534); naturally,
there
>>> might be
>>>>>>> bugs, especially considering the great amount of additions
>>> compared to 1.2.X
>>>>>>>    2. console is still under active development to reach usable
>>> state
>>>>>>> (remember we started it from scratch in 2.0.0) - Fabio and Marco
>>> are on it
>>>>>>>    3. enduser is more or less in the same situation of console,
>>> possibly a
>>>>>>> bit more close to the end - Andrea is on it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On enduser there are two main points to consider:
>>>>> 1. eventual roles and resources management that is considered in
>>> user
>>>>> create/update wizard, that can be postponed (or even omitted?).
>>>>> 2. enduser also needs to be "synchronized" with last core
>>> developments (on
>>>>> virtual attributes for example).
>>>>> So is correct to say that is more or less close to the end, but I
>>> wanted
>>>>> to underline these two priority issues.
>>>>>
>>>>>>    4. cli should be almost complete - Massimiliano is on it
>>>>>>>    5. documentation is less than half-way: getting started needs
to
>>> be
>>>>>>> adjusted with latest additions and reference guide is simply
yet
>>> to be
>>>>>>> written - I am on it, but seeking for contributions, especially
by
>>> native
>>>>>>> speakers - read Colm :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Given this overall situation, I would propose to:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    (i) keep pushing on 2, 3, 4 and 5 above
>>>>>>>    (ii) fix on (1) on request
>>>>>>>    (iii) as soon as 2 and 3 are in a presentable state, start
>>> thinking of
>>>>>>> milestone releases (2.0.0-M1, 2.0.0-M2, etc)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Forgot to add:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       (iv) move all residual (and cool) features currently scheduled
>>> for
>>>>>> 2.0.0 to 2.1.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As far as I can see it, it would be really nice to cut 2.0.0-M1
>>> before
>>>>>>> the end of year.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/ibcz7jx53su73dld
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> With M1 release I completely agree.
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Andrea
>


Mime
View raw message