Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B0041004D for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35977 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2014 08:12:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 35243 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2014 08:12:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 34494 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2014 08:12:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:12:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jcorvel@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.54] (HELO mail-qa0-f54.google.com) (209.85.216.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:12:45 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id s7so1125438qap.27 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 01:12:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d92lYn3BXeMI+rENXJM6XIe8j/zJiAx05iDhkinPMBw=; b=vyV0l5GgI98RUzKiHHbHbiQgdbErTDMuydl4GK4wBxD+s8pG8hiELRDRQt/sNvgKt1 WlVyOI5QRPpzeqIw+KPu+hLzNcN5BocOY5+AIQYTfLxSZ+djId8QZrl1RW1Gr7y7Qlto JSKzmroy1FYgrJHY5J+LbpLuHx9DP13Zb5kH5H1Xlmh29z1U37pdBpfo/zWGf7cgeALG KNm+5D3isSS4/EtkbXgmXiyMISTVjGUh2c+ferQ7FxT8D2FYQylLQ21jhY23on/6cqIa h1kf1FkC8koHE7vrKIWNt++wBnWmPcbybnHr+VLwoq1AHrb6234LpPiko67R5onp7Lov HsRQ== X-Received: by 10.224.41.75 with SMTP id n11mr39600448qae.21.1398759145209; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 01:12:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.96.143.100 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 01:12:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Johan Corveleyn Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:12:05 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?B?RndkOiDlm57lpI3vvJogQWNjZXNzIFNWTiBzbG93bHkgYXQgZmlyc3QgdGltZSBsb2dpbg==?= To: "users@subversion.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Forwarding to the list for archive-completeness ... --=20 Johan ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: =E8=9B=8B=E8=9B=8B/nv <419965953@qq.com> Date: Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:33 AM Subject: =E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9A Access SVN slowly at first time login To: Johan Corveleyn Dears: We solved the problem under your help, thanks! ------------------ =E5=8E=9F=E5=A7=8B=E9=82=AE=E4=BB=B6 ------------------ =E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: "Johan Corveleyn";; =E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4: 2014=E5=B9=B44=E6=9C=8818=E6=97=A5(= =E6=98=9F=E6=9C=9F=E4=BA=94) =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=884:13 =E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: "=E8=9B=8B=E8=9B=8B/nv"<419965953@qq.com>; =E6=8A=84=E9=80=81: "users"; =E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98: Re: Access SVN slowly at first time login On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:41 AM, =E8=9B=8B=E8=9B=8B/nv <419965953@qq.com> = wrote: > Dear: > I have a question when using SVN. Could you please help me on this? > We run two SVN virtual machines(with Windows Server 2003 system > installed Subversion Edge ) on the same physical machine.We set LDAP > authentication both on the two virtual machines.When we log in SVN at the > first time, it behaves slowly, and after I closed SVN log-in widows > mandatory, and log in SVN again, it behaves normally. > Looking forward to your reply! The problem might be related to the LDAP module performing the authentication. I'm not an expert in the LDAP-related httpd directives, but that's the direction I'd look first. Maybe as a first test you can try taking LDAP completely out of the picture, by using some other authentication module (plain user/pwd database) or even anonymous? Just as an experiment to rule out various possibilities. Another thing to try is: are you using the latest version of Edge -- if not maybe first try the latest? -- Johan