Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0653B10522 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69711 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2013 19:30:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 69692 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2013 19:30:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 69685 invoked by uid 99); 11 Dec 2013 19:30:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:30:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of brane@wandisco.com designates 74.125.83.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.42] (HELO mail-ee0-f42.google.com) (74.125.83.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:30:25 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id e53so3130343eek.1 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:30:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wandisco.com; s=gapps; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2046HqpI5lZ4kvI9B4mzLQ2IQ4HY6GksDI6XbuvxzLI=; b=FuU9FnhykOcDNf56JOih4bZdEG5tGmUKxyORzEWEjHQOIBLKHih0OMTNsrH1SYhWsD 7KkM5BtIaRkQ154tVehdMBuF3SgR/w3w+qNOYmLLZSzdTdZ6/tdkV4mSFfMAnPs8+OZJ 0TBSDHmBNVUsdd9y3mURljtcUs6x+C+EfcOrs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2046HqpI5lZ4kvI9B4mzLQ2IQ4HY6GksDI6XbuvxzLI=; b=QvGAr8WzCIBDzGMOHoj8p7Egi7ey2kZwVjPVYj55GSG36eosR3HzeytYmtFnVlZlze 1JlGbKKihqHvd2WjdtVIqfpnuEEt9f7M/+t1ACvfXiJU5zwXBAcsOld8EjZvaR+mKxxV qO5f8VIT9Tb7VSQ7GOE07W+jA5+rtyZUDgVB8DNatUDHkNF7s70cZEyEg8ZHUPWPL351 E0/erg3j9MjPqgonFiMqQCnTlTWnCShm0Lz4V1jnk8IgKpnKOjnK/dwCo+SCkYE/2KH3 VI4LZuz10No4FLirQ3HNHQrp6j1EtNg544ARIkDcy9Q57c8lIs4xlz9BDnUibcf0wDXY pZrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlXawyHwaY7chqAE3Uv9ew1zMQ2jzrbPtYXe1KYn7Y3RuxacDxiI6p9WnOauGgfyfOK7sG/ X-Received: by 10.15.23.206 with SMTP id h54mr3589477eeu.17.1386790203401; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:30:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from zulu.local (cpe-46-164-37-190.dynamic.amis.net. [46.164.37.190]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm56945886eeg.0.2013.12.11.11.30.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:30:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from zulu.local (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zulu.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EADA9BD02B8 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:29:59 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <52A8BD37.6090909@wandisco.com> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:29:59 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= Organization: WANdisco User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "users@subversion.apache.org" Subject: Re: Update-Only Checkout Enhancement References: <6dd4da1c7e5f4a088f2dab506d14d907@DM2PR05MB797.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <79b206f1bd45430a83dc13ca7906819d@DM2PR05MB797.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <52A8B995.2020901@wandisco.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11.12.2013 20:19, Bob Archer wrote: >> On 11.12.2013 17:21, Mark Kneisler wrote: >>> I think making the pristine files optional would work for me. >>> >>> >>> >>> Here’s an idea. >>> >>> >>> >>> Instead of having pristine copies of all files, how about adding to >>> the pristine directory only when a file is changed? >>> >> You know, that's a great idea! I wonder why we never thought of it >> ourselves? :) > Wouldn't that mean that you need to have some daemon service (or file watcher or something) running to determine if a file is modified? Yes. > Also, it would mean you would need a constant connection to the server to use a subversion working copy. Not necessarily; we don't need a pristine copy to check if a file is modified, or if 's out of date WRT the repository. But the former problem (requiring a daemon) is already a non-starter. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. brane@wandisco.com