Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0197D9123 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96571 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2012 11:50:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-users-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 96551 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2012 11:50:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 96538 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2012 11:50:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:50:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.140.74.2] (HELO continuum.iocl.org) (217.140.74.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:50:08 +0000 Received: (from krey@localhost) by continuum.iocl.org (8.11.3/8.9.3) id q55Bnlu15727; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:49:47 +0200 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:49:47 +0200 From: Andreas Krey To: Subversion Users Subject: Re: Externals: sqlite: constraint failed Message-ID: <20120605114947.GU10680@inner.h.iocl.org> References: <20120605054617.GQ10680@inner.h.iocl.org> <20120605092052.GE20891@ted.stsp.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120605092052.GE20891@ted.stsp.name> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-message-flag: What did you expect to see here? On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:20:52 +0000, Stefan Sperling wrote: ... > Can you reproduce this problem reliably, with a fresh repository and > working copy? I didn't even try; I never had anything like that beforehand. > In an earlier thread[1], you were showing problems with externals and > command cancellation. Is this the same working copy? If so, you might > be seeing a side-effect of the bug you already reported. Can't rule that out. I did the final runs for that one in another WC, but I may have ^C'ed this one, too. I mostly reported this because of the 'externals, again' note in one of the reactions in the ^C thread, so for now -> irreproducible. Andreas -- "Totally trivial. Famous last words." From: Linus Torvalds Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800