Mailing-List: contact users-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:38:41 +0200
From: Stefan Sperling <stsp@elego.de>
To: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de>
Cc: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@gmail.com>, users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn wc&repo performance
Message-ID: <20110809093841.GA18119@ted.stsp.name>
Mail-Followup-To: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de>,
	Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@gmail.com>, users@subversion.apache.org
References: <4E33D9EE.1090905@acm.org>
 <CACOoB6jAGxQyV3DTegAXd0POS0_uF3TKQoXw1aqTsc9JJLcCog@mail.gmail.com>
 <4E348745.1010903@acm.org>
 <B71A1F2C2D4E6D4CA096E91AC8B76248032F40DD@server02.in.3s-software.com>
 <20110801083813.GX25355@inner.h.iocl.org>
 <4E369E9F.70600@gmail.com>
 <20110809090643.GT25355@inner.h.iocl.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110809090643.GT25355@inner.h.iocl.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 11:06:43AM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote:
> But I may be barking up the wrong tree. I built svn 1.7 and ran my
> small 'second consecutive commit fails' test script with that. It's
> not the local operations, but those that act on the repository (here:
> file:///...) that take ridiculously long. Each commit and do-nothing
> 'svn up' takes about a second, for the five files involved. I've come
> to expect such operations to be instantaneous.

Which script are you referring to? Can you post it or provide a link?

What platform are you running your test on?