From dev-return-38776-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@subversion.apache.org Tue Dec 18 10:21:23 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 920DA180669 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:21:22 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 88002 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2018 09:21:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 87992 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2018 09:21:21 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org) (207.244.88.137) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:21:21 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.102] (unknown [222.93.235.222]) by mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 3EBCC2CDB for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:21:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Time for new patch releases: 1.11.1, 1.10.4, 1.9.10 To: dev@subversion.apache.org References: <1544454586.1581776.1604646552.19E9912E@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20181210151619.GU44110@ted.stsp.name> <1544826206.3423455.1609589568.2BA0AA6C@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Stefan Fuhrmann Organization: ASF Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:21:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1544826206.3423455.1609589568.2BA0AA6C@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US On 14.12.18 23:23, Julian Foad wrote: > There are some important server fixes nominated for backport: > > SVN-4791, an issue with the DAG open_path() (for 1.9, 1.10, 1.11) > SVN-4793, authz rights from inverted access selectors (for 1.10, 1.11) > > I'd like to cut new releases around the new year. > > Could anyone review these in the next week or so? > Done. -- Stefan^2.