subversion-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Shahaf <>
Subject Re: [RFC] Upgrade to C'90 as our minimum C language
Date Sun, 24 Sep 2017 20:05:36 GMT
Branko ─îibej wrote on Sun, 24 Sep 2017 21:56 +0200:
> What /I/ don't understand is why we're even having a discussion about
> using // comments. Is it really that hard to type two extra chars per
> comment, especially since any sane programming editor will add the
> delimiters in for you anyway?
> If the discussion were about more interesting features such as
> *restrict*ed pointers or mixed statements and variable declaration or
> *for*-scope variable declarations, that'd make some sense. But talking
> about just "C90 + //" is, IMO, a waste of time.

About //-comments specifically, my thinking was that if we supported such
comments we wouldn't run into "//-comments v. /**/-comments" conflicts
when updating our embedded utf8proc.

But to your wider point, I agree, //-comments aren't _the_ most
pressing C99 feature we might wish to adopt.  I was just trying to take
a "one step at a time" approach.  So, can we switch from C89 to C89 +
any single C99 feature?  E.g., C89 + <one of the features you just named>.



View raw message