Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+298UiwdgH6Gm6yHndskKC=FL=Z0wsit=3k+m7qPEq6geeqfA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+298Ug_ni7AiSUe2e69WnbSpOjr15D9osz-+=kLHtiG-hkMFQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <727D8E16AE957149B447FE368139F2B5A905C0B3@SERVER10> <CA+298Uiy+TcSo=ZzDMpdbBsL2Cm5N57p-r=kCYJ21g5=f-cRoQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+298Uh5xi3Q4yq5K1CYToW=kW3YDstjGtkjfxSUvJ_BOLM5JA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+298UjD8Y6SvzxCqXiXK3fV+-Lny+nrS37bQk7q3COZJ46VeA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+298Ug7Uwx+DB87TXfJirsVcCZXfBGFhWHOepsrDF+jE73TEw@mail.gmail.com>
 <727D8E16AE957149B447FE368139F2B5A905C836@SERVER10> <CA+298UiwdgH6Gm6yHndskKC=FL=Z0wsit=3k+m7qPEq6geeqfA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Paul Hammant <paul@hammant.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 15:03:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+298UhcEFptnSsfTcE6ntOZ66nbwCUv4oMy7cmhS3-yitXX7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Benchmarks for PUT for various fsfs config settings.
To: Markus Schaber <m.schaber@codesys.com>
Cc: Subversion Development <dev@subversion.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11408b760fac1e05561a6150"
archived-at: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 19:03:08 -0000

--001a11408b760fac1e05561a6150
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

http://imgur.com/a/vVKSx

This one is the original 128MB PUT test but on a Raspberry Pi Zero W
(client and server). Raspbian is based on Debian Jesse which uses Svn
1.8.10. The Zero has 512MB RAM and a 1Ghz ARM chip (the same spec as the
original Pi).  Performance was 1/6 of the CHUWI HiBox Smart Mini PC 4GB RAM
w/ a Quad Core Intel x5-Z8350 (used at the start of this thread).

Compression makes no difference here. The only differentiator is Rep
Sharing on the second and subsequent PUT (25% saving or cost, dep. on POV).
Well that and Svn 1.9.5 vs 1.8.10.

This setup would be good for documents, and music files, but not movies - I
don't know where it will crap out, butI suspect that it will. Apache has
timeouts after all. *And don't we all have war stories about timeouts and
hops!*

- Paul

--001a11408b760fac1e05561a6150
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><a href=3D"http://imgur.com/a/v=
VKSx">http://imgur.com/a/vVKSx</a><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br>=
</div>This one is the original 128MB PUT test but on a Raspberry Pi Zero W =
(client and server). Raspbian is based on Debian Jesse which uses Svn 1.8.1=
0. The Zero has 512MB RAM and a 1Ghz ARM chip (the same spec as the origina=
l Pi).=C2=A0 Performance was 1/6 of the CHUWI HiBox Smart Mini PC 4GB RAM w=
/ a Quad Core Intel x5-Z8350 (used at the start of this thread).<div><br></=
div><div><div>Compression makes no difference here. The only differentiator=
 is Rep Sharing on the second and subsequent PUT (25% saving or cost, dep. =
on POV). Well that and Svn 1.9.5 vs 1.8.10. =C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div=
>This setup would be good for documents, and music files, but not movies - =
I don&#39;t know where it will crap out, butI suspect that it will. Apache =
has timeouts after all. <i>And don&#39;t we all have war stories about time=
outs and hops!</i><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div></div></div><div=
 class=3D"gmail_extra">- Paul</div></div>

--001a11408b760fac1e05561a6150--