Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Subject: Re: JavaHL: "Not implemented" error in StatusEditor.addAbsent
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
References: <56557614.1080203@syntevo.com> <565582B2.3000203@apache.org>
 <5655CEF7.90805@syntevo.com> <003e01d1279a$f5629320$e027b960$@qqmail.nl>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Branko_=c4=8cibej?= <brane@apache.org>
Organization: The Apache Software Foundation
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAADBQTFRF
 IhsbCy0qZjoVOVRoeFxSAIKBzXQiAKaibYiewnk7nn9z0qCTgL3i87Ep6Kx/+tHBsrE+zgAAAjZJ
 REFUOMvF0jFoE1EYB/CzjWlqIzaTjqVIBifRRWyG0t5iUqlLyFpCeXBgKg5yq6A4degUDJjoUDpc
 1Qt4Ux94B11SOLB0KGS4discpbkORTCn9/m9d3fvLhXnvuHu3f+Xx/veyyfZfLSdZHzgicSfeyw4
 JISwdz8FT6M8lM8Ceg385Dlhs+cC9sQCDn0B78QCogzwN+sxfHGOIXBbRGkNAM4cZymGtgNsDPgz
 cByxon3EEm1TLmvAlghoHOO3CZSa+IQ/vF6JV8tgKOMow78gRgL2/+EIvATOUtB3SSdMg4GXgrbn
 uk0uLiGdoCHKbX4E+t1FUTqn1AtIdPJebssDQ64YANSQyyaQNyUOFs0ijMsMFnOPTahPLXKYowtY
 08MfCP7vR7hRnc5zmPK7CDYYbHcbC7tHuyFA94U/1LYZaJpu/sxACHMwvwZljTLY0TbNk4x+zuEt
 yC3MfCM6uSIvfwur0itFL4FA2Yal8BzLfnYV4EIGwEPAk7o5zIcnvzHMEjwJrrhAKK7on6IrsfRJ
 7A53BhaK+CL7fj6+q/sPeOvcDTtoZTxpUYsFeIknrOXep3p3l7Ua+8sZ5FPQKyKwWi+DfROTU7ny
 C1/9UhpeY7K287WJCzbsNPQm2S6Yk4PSCNhWM2r3nD0K9liYb6yPgCRJhSzPrxUK0yUBVk1VX0lj
 s7MzGZyp0wImMK/e8rHbz2soL+O+2r1dxfGsAmBcx0lNjS/RUhlUC7gRn1wGMdQ7Vw1/AReW/RN3
 xFWdAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC
Message-ID: <56560667.6070608@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:05:11 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <003e01d1279a$f5629320$e027b960$@qqmail.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 25.11.2015 17:04, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Strapetz [mailto:marc.strapetz@syntevo.com]
>> Sent: woensdag 25 november 2015 16:09
>> To: Branko Čibej <brane@apache.org>; dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: JavaHL: "Not implemented" error in StatusEditor.addAbsent
>>
>> On 25.11.2015 10:43, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 25.11.2015 09:49, Marc Strapetz wrote:
>>>> One of our users has reported following Exception against Subversion
>>>> 1.9.2:
>>>>
>>>> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Not implemented:
>>>> StatusEditor.addAbsent
>>>>      at
>>>>
>> org.apache.subversion.javahl.remote.StatusEditor.addAbsent(StatusEditor.j
>> ava:110)
>>>>      ... 15 more
>>>>
>>>> Actually, StatusEditor.addAbsent looks like this:
>>>>
>>>> public void addAbsent(String relativePath,
>>>>                        NodeKind kind,
>>>>                        long replacesRevision)
>>>> {
>>>>    //DEBUG:System.err.println("  [J] StatusEditor.addAbsent");
>>>>    checkState();
>>>>    throw new RuntimeException("Not implemented:
>> StatusEditor.addAbsent");
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Is there any more debug information I should try to collect?
>>> Well, it's not implemented ... I can't think of anything more specific?
>> I'm wondering whether it was not implemented by intention, because it's
>> not expected to be called (same as for copy/move)? Actually, this is the
>> only user who is experiencing this problem, so conditions causing this
>> problem seem to be very specific. Fortunately it's currently perfectly
>> reproducible for him. Should I ask for an "svn status -u" output?
> This should be perfectly reproducable when you call status on a directory that contains subdirectories that you are not allowed to read (via a mod_authz_svn config file or similar svnserve config).
>
> svn status -u explicitly ignores absent nodes.


Then  I guess JavaHL's status editor should do the same?

-- Brane