Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D5EB17E8F for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32416 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2015 18:10:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 32367 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2015 18:10:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 3769 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2015 18:03:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:03:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [54.76.25.247] (HELO mx1-eu-west.apache.org) (54.76.25.247) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:03:29 +0000 Received: from rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk [65.20.0.178]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B4E10203A1 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:02:57 +0000 (UTC) X-OWM-Source-IP: 209.85.212.172(US) X-OWM-Env-Sender: julianfoad@btinternet.com X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090205.55353F4A.008C,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=7/50,refid=2.7.2:2015.4.16.145718:17:7.944,ip=209.85.212.172,rules=__PHISH_SPEAR_HTTP_RECEIVED, __YOUTUBE_RCVD, __MIME_VERSION, __IN_REP_TO, __REFERENCES, __HAS_FROM, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, CT_TEXT_PLAIN_UTF8_CAPS, __HELO_GMAIL, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, BODY_SIZE_200_299, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __RDNS_GMAIL, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, WEBMAIL_SOURCE, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, SMALL_BODY, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_2, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS, NO_URI_FOUND, REFERENCES, __DQ_NEG_IP, __DQ_NEG_HEUR X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (209.85.212.172) by rgout01.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.122.06) (authenticated as julianfoad@btopenworld.com) id 552FCFF4007A3487 for dev@subversion.apache.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:02:50 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1429552977; bh=J/ui8ZwJnk2QkSAsdCEqVCFcKkiwQMAjOSd1I9SpLg0=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc; b=jz1AxsOfBKjBPbOxLemwOw2E84lMaW9fEoWCjOXaZSueCCFxSDALUvUYVcI6YUyLakG5fB4ispYpkf7/4o+U/BTcdbXl4nS16eN39zEkqySjQriTHN2wq/eosWcWo6dQMmhkiefACrGsG0R4GiZRKtPvchXXKW3/A36aoWRnGpI= Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so109551976wid.0 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:02:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.86.234 with SMTP id s10mr26864992wiz.50.1429552959530; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:02:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.76.143 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:02:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <552F38A3.3050300@reser.org> <55317E29.5080106@reser.org> <553507F8.80003@reser.org> From: Julian Foad Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:02:19 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ready for 1.9.0RC1 next Friday? To: Ben Reser Cc: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org BTW I know there are already two +1 votes for this backport, and so it's very likely to be voted in very soon, and then the dependency on *this* specific backport will be moot. My point is about the uncertainty about what we're waiting for. - Julian