Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E87717C82 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53889 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2015 08:44:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 53835 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2015 08:44:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 53824 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2015 08:44:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:44:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jcorvel@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.46 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.46] (HELO mail-qg0-f46.google.com) (209.85.192.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:44:40 +0000 Received: by qgfa8 with SMTP id a8so87109525qgf.0 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 01:42:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=m50ojnr3dSz3g50nB1jWub1Ps7QZM1QGfK3wp5X/vAU=; b=GPlAk8gUCb2fpmjuWC6Bw0iT1fzoQH01u7LPn0lVebyEDoxC5qPkZOGj/8XIfcuU+g /SF7cOhN4PoG/vVK8WAZ6jHQDGjdJjQzqfZyQ+2mtDJ9A9kIdDfBkrGBFwMGA17qBel3 ltOF2cSEXus/11xGD45l9Je/Em+xJgDbvbm+uPbrSO7tdhiKfv3NQX/L/4K1dVlwRWSe MLnDy/oGxPwnbkn0Nlcw6HuEYPhHwsArIqY9KW3IqMwW7UWqqnmNI8hZFiX9/nPdhFKL 6lWJABeTBwrnG3CoEW3UWsskh7M8W4Lz3p2GE1I4bD+G0m4tSBpoGR03ztoSZQvAQrzH ACYg== X-Received: by 10.140.232.197 with SMTP id d188mr104390074qhc.80.1426840969924; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 01:42:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.96.248.48 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 01:42:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150320070354.GE25475@ted.stsp.name> References: <20150318140915.GC24728@ted.stsp.name>

<20150320070354.GE25475@ted.stsp.name> From: Johan Corveleyn Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:42:29 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 1.7.20 release candidates up for testing/signing To: Johan Corveleyn , Subversion Development , Philip Martin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > Johan Corveleyn writes: > >> >> svn: E160004: Corrupt node-revision '0.0.r9/882' >> svn: E160004: Missing id field in node-rev > > I don't see that on my Linux box. That's a complaint about the root > node of r9, near the end of the file db/revs/0/0. On my Linux box the > offset is 881 not 882, and the file ends: > > id: 0.0.r9/881 > type: dir > pred: 0.0.r8/0 > count: 9 > text: 9 796 72 72 0bbc6c909be39d253813928a4611c161 > cpath: / > copyroot: 0 / > minfo-cnt: 1 > > 0-1.0.t8-8 modify-dir false true /trunk > > 1-2.0.t8-8 modify-file true false /trunk/1 > > 4-2.0.t8-8 modify-file true false /trunk/2 > > > 881 1018 Thanks for looking this up. Unfortunately, I can't verify the rev file, since I don't have it anymore, it has been overwritten by trying to reproduce it (grrrr, should remember to backup leftover repositories and working copies after a failed test run, before trying to reproduce it). Whatever I try now, I can't reproduce it anymore :-(. On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 07:40:41PM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> Wait, did I say "reproducible"? Gah, I had it once, then reproduced it >> shortly after (it's still in my scrollback history), then sent this >> mail, and now I can't reproduce it anymore :-(. I've tried at least 20 >> more times ... This it not fun. >> >> What has changed between the fails and now? > >> - Stopped Apache 2.4.12 which was still running (standalone, separate >> console window). > > Hmm... > Perhaps there was a corrupt revision contents cache that got flushed > by restarting Apache? > > Otherwise, no idea. Thanks for the suggestion, maybe something like that could be the cause. Not exactly a corrupt cache in Apache (because the test failure I had was with ra_svn), but perhaps a leftover corrupt repository on disk, still being locked by apache or ... something like that. Otherwise I don't see how an Apache process could interfere with an svnserve process. I do remember that, before I started the ra_svn tests, I did a short attempt with ra_serf against that particular Apache process (which I had just started then). That test run failed somewhere (because of a known issue of AVG Surf Shield interfering with serf (issue #4175 -- fixed in 1.8 but never backported to 1.7)), and I aborted it (Ctrl-C). After that I left Apache running, disabled AVG Surf Shield, and started a batch script that ran ra_local, ra_svn, ra_neon and ra_serf in sequence. So maybe, just maybe, that first aborted ra_serf run left something broken on disk that was later hit by the ra_svn test run (but not by the ra_local test run that ran first, and not by the ra_neon and ra_serf test runs that came later ???). Anyway, I'm going to leave it at that, and conclude this is some weird one-time local issue. I'll retest ra_svn once more tonight, and if successful I'll commit my signature tonight or tomorrow. -- Johan