Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ivan@visualsvn.com designates
 209.85.216.173 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+t0gk1-ETt4Th8i0VW4wf2SkqsBojg_9s6f+5EfjqA1G-4vMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CABw-3YdthOfMH4AWwNQ-=Em=sO64z_MMCd-Y+4zptBkqciKv8A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+t0gk1-ETt4Th8i0VW4wf2SkqsBojg_9s6f+5EfjqA1G-4vMw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan@visualsvn.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:37:23 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CABw-3Yd=jBQtNSv-QjTzG_hsX_OFvWnNhDgwzXgf8kOvftRVHg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Subversion 1.9.0-dev FSFS performance tests
To: Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann@wandisco.com>
Cc: Subversion Development <dev@subversion.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 20 June 2014 12:33, Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrmann@wandisco.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan@visualsvn.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've performed several FSFS performace tests using latest Subversion
>> from trunk@r1602928.
>>
>> Please find results bellow. I'm also attaching results as a table in
>> pdf for easier reading.
>>
>> Environment:
>> Windows Server 2012 R2 (x64)
>> 2 GB RAM, with 2 virtual processors hosted on Macbook with SSD disk
>> Subversion 1.9.0-dev from trunk@r1602928
>> Test data: Ruby project repository (46054 revisions, 400mb-500mb size on
>> disk)
>>
>> All tests are performed using default options.
>>
>> Tests performed:
>> 1. svnadmin load -- loading first 5000 revisions into repository
>> 2. svnadmin dump -- dumping all repository revions to NUL
>> 3. svn log http:// -- svn log over http:// protocol to NUL
>> 4. svn log file:// -- svn log over file:// protocol to NUL
>> 5. svn export http:// -- svn export over http:// protocol to local disk
>> 6. svn export file:// -- svn export over file:// protocol to local disk
>>
>> Subversion 1.9.0-dev, fsfs6 unpacked repository
>> ===============================================
>
> ..
>>
>> svn export http://   7.336      7.757    7.437
>> svn export file://   4.151      4.854    4.310
>
>
> Did you actually run the export on the repository root?
I did run svn export only for trunk of course, but I tested svn log on
repository root.

-- 
Ivan Zhakov