| Daniel Shahaf |
Re: Would branching across repositories be theoretically possible? |
Tue, 01 Jan, 00:47 |
| Ben Reser |
Re: Would branching across repositories be theoretically possible? |
Tue, 01 Jan, 01:41 |
| Ben Reser |
Re: Would branching across repositories be theoretically possible? |
Tue, 01 Jan, 02:23 |
| Miriam Hochwald |
Re: Apache Subversion: GNOME Women Outreach |
Tue, 01 Jan, 08:08 |
| Stefan Fuhrmann |
Re: Would branching across repositories be theoretically possible? |
Tue, 01 Jan, 14:38 |
| Johan Corveleyn |
Re: Would branching across repositories be theoretically possible? |
Tue, 01 Jan, 18:53 |
| Branko Čibej |
Re: Would branching across repositories be theoretically possible? |
Tue, 01 Jan, 19:48 |
| Daniel Shahaf |
Re: Would branching across repositories be theoretically possible? |
Tue, 01 Jan, 19:52 |
| Gabriela Gibson |
Re: Proposal for OPW project |
Tue, 01 Jan, 21:17 |
| Johan Corveleyn |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Tue, 01 Jan, 21:39 |
| Daniel Shahaf |
Re: Would branching across repositories be theoretically possible? |
Wed, 02 Jan, 00:18 |
| Branko Čibej |
Re: Proposal for OPW project |
Wed, 02 Jan, 00:55 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: Would branching across repositories be theoretically possible? |
Wed, 02 Jan, 02:19 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: Proposal for OPW project |
Wed, 02 Jan, 02:21 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: Apache Subversion: GNOME Women Outreach |
Wed, 02 Jan, 02:30 |
| Miriam Hochwald |
Re: Apache Subversion: GNOME Women Outreach |
Wed, 02 Jan, 02:43 |
| Branko Čibej |
Re: Apache Subversion: GNOME Women Outreach |
Wed, 02 Jan, 03:49 |
| Ziemowit Laski |
RE: Would branching across repositories be theoretically possible? |
Wed, 02 Jan, 09:00 |
| Gabriela Gibson |
[PATCH]: Re: Proposal for OPW project |
Wed, 02 Jan, 09:21 |
| Philip Martin |
Re: Proposal for OPW project |
Wed, 02 Jan, 10:38 |
| Branko Čibej |
Re: [PATCH]: Re: Proposal for OPW project |
Wed, 02 Jan, 10:57 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: Apache Subversion: GNOME Women Outreach |
Wed, 02 Jan, 11:42 |
| Philip Martin |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Wed, 02 Jan, 17:56 |
| Philip Martin |
Re: 1.8 Progress |
Wed, 02 Jan, 18:07 |
| Paul Burba |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Wed, 02 Jan, 18:51 |
| Ben Reser |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Wed, 02 Jan, 19:04 |
| Bert Huijben |
RE: 1.8 Progress |
Wed, 02 Jan, 19:07 |
| Paul Burba |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Wed, 02 Jan, 19:12 |
| Ben Reser |
Re: Apache Subversion: GNOME Women Outreach |
Wed, 02 Jan, 19:13 |
| Ben Reser |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Wed, 02 Jan, 19:22 |
| Mark Phippard |
Re: Apache Subversion: GNOME Women Outreach |
Wed, 02 Jan, 19:25 |
| Ben Reser |
Re: Apache Subversion: GNOME Women Outreach |
Wed, 02 Jan, 19:42 |
| Gabriela Gibson |
Re: Proposal for OPW project |
Wed, 02 Jan, 20:14 |
| Philip Martin |
Re: Proposal for OPW project |
Wed, 02 Jan, 21:59 |
| Paul Burba |
Re: svn commit: r1424469 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_client/repos_diff.c tests/cmdline/merge_reintegrate_tests.py tests/cmdline/merge_tests.py tests/cmdline/merge_tree_conflict_tests.py |
Wed, 02 Jan, 22:44 |
| Philip Herron |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Wed, 02 Jan, 23:26 |
| Philip Martin |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Thu, 03 Jan, 00:22 |
| Ben Reser |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Thu, 03 Jan, 00:30 |
| Philip Herron |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Thu, 03 Jan, 00:32 |
| Philip Herron |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Thu, 03 Jan, 00:43 |
| Philip Martin |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Thu, 03 Jan, 00:53 |
| Philip Herron |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Thu, 03 Jan, 01:07 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
[PATCH] Add -no-suppress to LT_CFLAGS |
Thu, 03 Jan, 01:52 |
| Miriam Hochwald |
Re: Apache Subversion: GNOME Women Outreach |
Thu, 03 Jan, 03:17 |
| Daniel Shahaf |
Re: [PATCH]: Re: Proposal for OPW project |
Thu, 03 Jan, 04:09 |
| Daniel Shahaf |
Re: [PATCH] Procedure for making web page changes |
Thu, 03 Jan, 04:34 |
| Peter Samuelson |
Re: [PATCH] Add -no-suppress to LT_CFLAGS |
Thu, 03 Jan, 07:18 |
| Johan Corveleyn |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Thu, 03 Jan, 07:31 |
| Branko Čibej |
Re: [PATCH]: Re: Proposal for OPW project |
Thu, 03 Jan, 07:58 |
| Ben Reser |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Thu, 03 Jan, 08:26 |
| Ben Reser |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Thu, 03 Jan, 08:29 |
| Prabhu Gnana Sundar |
Re: [PATCH] Implement svnadmin verify --keep-going |
Thu, 03 Jan, 10:12 |
| Philip Martin |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Thu, 03 Jan, 11:08 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: [PATCH] Add -no-suppress to LT_CFLAGS |
Thu, 03 Jan, 11:24 |
| Stefan Sperling |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Thu, 03 Jan, 13:05 |
| Branko Čibej |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Thu, 03 Jan, 14:07 |
| C. Michael Pilato |
What version of Serf will be the required minimum for Subversion 1.8? |
Thu, 03 Jan, 16:02 |
| Branko Čibej |
Re: What version of Serf will be the required minimum for Subversion 1.8? |
Thu, 03 Jan, 16:23 |
| C. Michael Pilato |
Re: What version of Serf will be the required minimum for Subversion 1.8? |
Thu, 03 Jan, 16:50 |
| Mark Phippard |
Re: svn commit: r1428561 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client: client.h diff.c diff_summarize.c |
Thu, 03 Jan, 19:26 |
| Daniel Shahaf |
Re: svn commit: r1427254 - /subversion/trunk/tools/server-side/svnauthz-validate.c |
Thu, 03 Jan, 20:17 |
| Lieven Govaerts |
Re: What version of Serf will be the required minimum for Subversion 1.8? |
Thu, 03 Jan, 20:27 |
| Ben Reser |
Re: svn commit: r1427254 - /subversion/trunk/tools/server-side/svnauthz-validate.c |
Thu, 03 Jan, 20:38 |
| Branko Čibej |
Re: svn commit: r1427254 - /subversion/trunk/tools/server-side/svnauthz-validate.c |
Thu, 03 Jan, 20:40 |
| Ben Reser |
Re: svn commit: r1427254 - /subversion/trunk/tools/server-side/svnauthz-validate.c |
Thu, 03 Jan, 20:50 |
| Gabriela Gibson |
[PATCH]: Re: Proposal for OPW project |
Thu, 03 Jan, 22:27 |
| Daniel Shahaf |
Re: svn commit: r1428209 - in /subversion/trunk: Makefile.in build.conf build/win32/make_dist.py tools/server-side/svnauthz-validate.c tools/server-side/svnauthz.c |
Thu, 03 Jan, 22:46 |
| Greg Stein |
Re: What version of Serf will be the required minimum for Subversion 1.8? |
Thu, 03 Jan, 23:29 |
| Gabriela Gibson |
Re: Proposal for OPW project |
Thu, 03 Jan, 23:34 |
| Branko Čibej |
Re: [PATCH]: Re: Proposal for OPW project |
Fri, 04 Jan, 00:51 |
| Daniel Shahaf |
Re: Proposal for OPW project |
Fri, 04 Jan, 01:49 |
| Branko Čibej |
Re: What version of Serf will be the required minimum for Subversion 1.8? |
Fri, 04 Jan, 02:07 |
| Ben Reser |
Re: svn commit: r1428209 - in /subversion/trunk: Makefile.in build.conf build/win32/make_dist.py tools/server-side/svnauthz-validate.c tools/server-side/svnauthz.c |
Fri, 04 Jan, 03:32 |
| Ben Reser |
Re: [PATCH] code file names linkified in general.html of the Hacking Guide |
Fri, 04 Jan, 04:07 |
| Julian Foad |
Re: [PATCH] Implement svnadmin verify --keep-going |
Fri, 04 Jan, 15:03 |
| Philip Martin |
Re: 1.8 Progress |
Fri, 04 Jan, 15:06 |
| Bert Huijben |
RE: 1.8 Progress |
Fri, 04 Jan, 15:48 |
| Paul Burba |
Re: svn commit: r1424469 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_client/repos_diff.c tests/cmdline/merge_reintegrate_tests.py tests/cmdline/merge_tests.py tests/cmdline/merge_tree_conflict_tests.py |
Fri, 04 Jan, 17:44 |
| Julian Foad |
The purpose of prepare_merge_props_changed() |
Fri, 04 Jan, 17:47 |
| C. Michael Pilato |
Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 18:23 |
| Stefan Sperling |
Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 18:31 |
| Julian Foad |
Re: The purpose of prepare_merge_props_changed() |
Fri, 04 Jan, 20:04 |
| Ben Reser |
Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing |
Fri, 04 Jan, 20:46 |
| Daniel Shahaf |
Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 20:57 |
| C. Michael Pilato |
Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 21:25 |
| C. Michael Pilato |
Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 21:26 |
| Daniel Shahaf |
Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 21:26 |
| C. Michael Pilato |
Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 21:54 |
| Stefan Sperling |
Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 21:54 |
| Julian Foad |
Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 22:10 |
| C. Michael Pilato |
Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 22:12 |
| C. Michael Pilato |
Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 22:29 |
| Stefan Sperling |
Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 22:44 |
| Branko Čibej |
Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 22:48 |
| Daniel Shahaf |
Re: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 22:50 |
| Bert Huijben |
RE: Regarding issue #3348 ("Provide syntax which means 'include all files *not* in a changelist'") |
Fri, 04 Jan, 23:51 |
| Branko Čibej |
[RFC] Deprecate Berkelety DB filesystem backend |
Sat, 05 Jan, 01:34 |
| Bert Huijben |
RE: svn propchange: r1429201 - svn:log |
Sat, 05 Jan, 09:55 |
| Philip Martin |
Re: [RFC] Deprecate Berkelety DB filesystem backend |
Sat, 05 Jan, 10:35 |
| Stefan Fuhrmann |
Re: [RFC] Deprecate Berkelety DB filesystem backend |
Sat, 05 Jan, 15:10 |