subversion-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com>
Subject Re: Compressed Pristines (Summary)
Date Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:32:19 GMT
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Branko ─îibej <brane@apache.org> wrote:
> On 05.04.2012 17:35, Ashod Nakashian wrote:
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wright@wandisco.com>
>>>
>>> I'm glad we've found a way to relegate this problem to a "minor...technicality."
>> So far no objections then.
>>
>> What's the preferred mode of operation in such a case?
>>
>> I can update the proposal and start sending patches for the dev-list to review or
I can work in a branch with post-commit reviews.
>
> I'd like to see this happen on trunk, with the whole compressed-pristine
> functionality wrapped in conditional-compilation blocks.
>
> However, there's likely to be a lot of churn and reviewing all those
> patches would never happen in real time. Therefore, I propose you do the
> work on a branch, CTR of course. There should be no problem giving you
> branch commit access, IMO.

And you can speed up the process by filing a CLA, if you have not
already done so:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf

-Hyrum



-- 

uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
http://www.uberSVN.com/

Mime
View raw message