Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A41F292BE for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 15:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15405 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2012 15:48:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 15358 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2012 15:48:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 15351 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2012 15:48:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:48:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.29] (HELO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:48:01 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id A453A21675; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 10:47:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:47:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh= PSB2xwge/Nz10wkkxaYENfo9J5E=; b=EL/8LR+8Aw2/oLcaD1/sQKARNCIuDxne P7pEtIqXuB66u/TRhrqyKiDH0nmFfrCBhv7LzwSEZ+Hybhi6OI/5Qw0obUKi53Ab it9WriU5AKQVTaSHspT7Bzj2qP3K+Rluzcjw3iHsSW2IqZISxPBIzlY55s2n7dZt VP48NSIKWvs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=PSB2xwge/Nz10wkkxaYENfo9J5E=; b=HgkzJ0OpQLScz4Hi0Fx/ZkuCz77Z xG6KB2xuJGdFNkrj+ihFu7TTYmhTEe4Kt2E2SkMYFsVQMIYv6iMnGX+D3supZ8YN Lu4mhGwu/KzGhGbMPbN7BT4AwyCh3cyqN9Xmt5FG0e48T7QWHktlMpuvVtarhLIk FF4ahrksQrosegM= X-Sasl-enc: w8M61388IFEbMcEyKfDpX9aqQWSBQWdyBNXYA3B10XAI0fBKGC5TuG7yh/4CXA 1328629660 Received: from daniel3.local (bzq-79-180-206-85.red.bezeqint.net [79.180.206.85]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A91D78E021C; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 10:47:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:47:29 +0200 From: Daniel Shahaf To: dev@subversion.apache.org Cc: Matthijs Kooijman , "Hyrum K. Wright" Subject: Re: [PATCH] More bindings for gnome_keyring / platform_specific_client_providers Message-ID: <20120207154728.GA3102@daniel3.local> References: <20120105200619.GZ17548@login.drsnuggles.stderr.nl> <20120207153114.GY16542@login.drsnuggles.stderr.nl> <20120207153754.GB8137@ted.stsp.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120207153754.GB8137@ted.stsp.name> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 16:37:54 +0100: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 04:31:14PM +0100, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > > over a year ago, I submitted a patch to make the > > > svn_auth_get_platform_specific_client_providers perl bindings work, to > > > allow git-svn to work with gnome_keyring. Since then, I've been working > > > on some further improvements, which I've attached as patches. > > has anyone got a chance to have a look at these patches? Daniel applied > > the first trivial patch, but I'd like to get the others in as wel... > > > > I've refreshed the patches against current trunk and re-attached them. > > 02-python-platform-providers.patch was changed to resolve a conflict > > with r1235264. > > It appears the attachment is missing. > > Sometimes the apache.org lists discard attachments silently. > I am not sure if got this fixed yet. It's fixed, our dev@ list should allow attachments. > > Or maybe you simply forgot to attach the files? > You can also send patches inline instead of as an attachment.