Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFB779236 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39267 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2012 10:15:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-subversion-dev-archive@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 38291 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2012 10:15:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@subversion.apache.org Received: (qmail 36828 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2012 10:15:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:15:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.29] (HELO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:14:55 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A3824475; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 05:14:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:14:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh= Jpo7pNlhM24nOB0lBQgMjAx9ALo=; b=Wlge651uiJ6W5dDoRCPOMUM4gteKY5Mk tJcpJw8oo4MXDtUwiv+afOXC9rnyXQa7uzAww1CV+OLl03+e3T2ZKGyqo0tP+XYT +tHGEgT8wOaxR336cXRWdZdb/S4q4RPUZFZ2xKy1XzEzek1fOKY2Pp/+EiXblzRj 9vxDEPJ8ZLQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=Jpo7pNlhM24nOB0lBQgMjAx9ALo=; b=mkqqZmOX1SSmoEB/fYs/GUOCiAo4 xtnZoJtcwi6jursY2Ohe9A9aQTaPdxyMaapqCKjCHq9I2LCE7Rdh6qwL6ED0hnF/ D0axfH9zvATlVSn3U7grgNDjyTGYI9M+3vEQzHLGREUb4RtT2fbJ2TE8AZPZw2LF xCy7ZDUp9KWAU6s= X-Sasl-enc: PCXT4SmTdceZE5FnwUwiIY8wVpnUcmtnS20E7ADj5v501Jz4Xl4afkQ5I51SWw 1328091274 Received: from daniel3.local (bzq-79-180-196-217.red.bezeqint.net [79.180.196.217]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 683428E0153; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 05:14:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:14:21 +0200 From: Daniel Shahaf To: dev@subversion.apache.org Cc: commits@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1239033 - in /subversion/branches/multi-layer-moves: BRANCH-README subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-queries.sql subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c subversion/tests/libsvn_wc/op-depth-test.c Message-ID: <20120201101251.GA26948@daniel3.local> References: <20120201100415.956C12388860@eris.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120201100415.956C12388860@eris.apache.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) philip@apache.org wrote on Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:04:15 -0000: > Added: subversion/branches/multi-layer-moves/BRANCH-README > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/multi-layer-moves/BRANCH-README?rev=1239033&view=auto > ============================================================================== > --- subversion/branches/multi-layer-moves/BRANCH-README (added) > +++ subversion/branches/multi-layer-moves/BRANCH-README Wed Feb 1 10:04:14 2012 > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > +Multi-layer moves in the WC > + > +This involves moving NODES.moved_to from the BASE node to the WORKING > +node. See: http://wiki.apache.org/subversion/MultiLayerMoves Is that URL stable? For someone digging history in a year from now, if we delete the wiki page by then, can they easily get an archived version of it? Daniel (not against using the wiki, just trying to understand how archiveable it is)