subversion-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "C. Michael Pilato" <>
Subject Re: Status of 1.7.3
Date Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:13:59 GMT
On 02/09/2012 05:22 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright <> writes:
>> Is there any sense of closure on the serf+windows test failure on the
>> 1.7.x branch?  My sense is that the failure does *not* expose a new
>> bug on the branch, but rather smokes out an existing one.
> That's my view as well.  svnrdump has a bug that causes it to rely on
> the server responding to serf's series HTTP requests in a particular
> order.  It's not a new bug.

Has that actually been established?  I mean, if all svnrdump is doing is
expecting ra_serf to honor the well-established, well-documented, but
ra_serf-flaunting Ev1 editor drive ordering rules ... is that really
svnrdump's bug?

C. Michael Pilato <>
CollabNet   <>   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

View raw message