subversion-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bert Huijben" <b...@vmoo.com>
Subject RE: svn commit: r920424 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/svn_wc_private.h libsvn_wc/lock.c libsvn_wc/util.c libsvn_wc/wc.h
Date Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:56:31 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.martin@wandisco.com]
> Sent: woensdag 2 juni 2010 23:45
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r920424 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
> include/private/svn_wc_private.h libsvn_wc/lock.c libsvn_wc/util.c
> libsvn_wc/wc.h
> 
> Paul Burba <ptburba@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > This implies that a disjoint child is equivalent to a switched child,
> > but despite child_is_disjoint's lack of documentation, it seems clear
> > that a child can be disjoint but not switched.  Am I missing something
> > here?
> 
> I think you are correct.  Perhaps child_is_disjoint could set a switched
flag as
> well as a disjoint flag?  SVN_ERR_WC_NOT_DIRECTORY is deprecated, it
> should be changed to SVN_ERR_WC_NOT_WORKING_COPY.

I think we have some _wc_is_root function that performs all these checks,
but (without looking at the code) I'm not sure if it correctly checks all
kinds of sub working copy obstructions I described in my previous mail
correctly.

	Bert
> 
> --
> Philip


Mime
View raw message