subversion-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Hudson <ghud...@MIT.EDU>
Subject Re: Subversion in 2010
Date Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:21:53 GMT
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 11:31 -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> "To be a compelling replacement for git/Mercurial", perhaps?

That seems tough.  The major architectural differences between
git/Mercurial/Bazaar and Subversion are:

  * No commitment to mixed-revision working copies.
  * Full history of at least one branch is generally stored on clients.
  * DVCS workflow support.

For small projects and a certain class of developers, these can be huge
advantages.  For huge projects and a different class of developers,
these can be hindrances.

(See also

View raw message