subversion-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From s...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r1674422 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
Date Sat, 18 Apr 2015 00:05:47 GMT
Author: stsp
Date: Sat Apr 18 00:05:47 2015
New Revision: 1674422

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1674422
Log:
* STATUS: Move r1674406 into approved section (3 votes for core, 2 for JavaHL).

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS?rev=1674422&r1=1674421&r2=1674422&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS Sat Apr 18 00:05:47 2015
@@ -29,19 +29,6 @@ Candidate changes that cannot go into a
      +0.8: rhuijben (for 1.9.0. Last minute change. Patch tested & Ok)
      -0.5: rhuijben (after 1.9.0. Changes error behaviour. Might break scripts)
 
- * r1674406
-   Fix implementation of svn_client_copy7 with pin-externals enabled to match
-   the documented behaviour.
-   Justification:
-     The API docs were correct but the implementation was not.
-   Note:
-     Has to be part of a .0 release because it affects public API semantics.
-   Votes:
-     +1: brane, stsp
-     +1: rhuijben (+1 on libsvn_client change.
-                   +0 for the JavaHL testcase
-                      (this part just tested, not 100% reviewed))
-
 Other candidate changes:
 ========================
 
@@ -156,3 +143,16 @@ Approved changes:
                      a 1.9 server should have vastly quicker log computation)
      -0.5: kotkov (could not reproduce the improvement with a real-world 1.9
                    server; see my e-mail to <dev@subversion.apache.org>)
+
+ * r1674406
+   Fix implementation of svn_client_copy7 with pin-externals enabled to match
+   the documented behaviour.
+   Justification:
+     The API docs were correct but the implementation was not.
+   Note:
+     Has to be part of a .0 release because it affects public API semantics.
+   Votes:
+     +1: brane, stsp
+     +1: rhuijben (+1 on libsvn_client change.
+                   +0 for the JavaHL testcase
+                      (this part just tested, not 100% reviewed))



Mime
View raw message